From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Tobias C. Rittweiler" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is this fallout from the end-of-defun changes? Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:13:11 +0100 Message-ID: <877i36s1ag.fsf@freebits.de> References: <87vdqvedpd.fsf@freebits.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1236118427 28494 80.91.229.12 (3 Mar 2009 22:13:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 22:13:47 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 03 23:15:04 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LectB-0004NH-69 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 23:15:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40818 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lecrp-0006Vy-Ie for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:13:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lecrk-0006VU-WA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:13:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lecrj-0006VF-GM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:13:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34797 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lecrj-0006VC-9U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:13:31 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:42993 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lecri-0000PJ-SJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:13:31 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Lecra-0007wp-MD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:13:23 +0000 Original-Received: from host145.natpool.mwn.de ([138.246.7.145]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:13:22 +0000 Original-Received: from tcr by host145.natpool.mwn.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 22:13:22 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: host145.natpool.mwn.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:8p52BH3rJN1YVHJae8WcRFAflnM= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:109426 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > > That does not seem to be fixed properly: > > > > 1 > > > > 2; point here, then C-M-x > > > > (defun foo () 42) > > > > This evaluates `foo'. > > Yes, same as in Emacs-22. > C-M-x presumes you're evaluating a "defun", not just a constant number. Please excuse me that I called this a regression then. I was tricked that C-M-x on 1 _does_ evaluate the 1---both on 23.0.91.2 and 23.0.60.1, but not on 22.1.1. So the behaviour did change somewhat, just not the way I thought it was supposed to change. :-) -T.