Re: Is this fallout from the end-of-defun changes?

["Tobias C. Rittweiler" <tcr@freebits.de>]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:

> > That does not seem to be fixed properly:
> >
> >   1
> > 
> >   2; point here, then C-M-x
> >
> >   (defun foo () 42)
> >
> > This evaluates `foo'.
>
> Yes, same as in Emacs-22.
> C-M-x presumes you're evaluating a "defun", not just a constant number.

Please excuse me that I called this a regression then. I was tricked
that C-M-x on 1 _does_ evaluate the 1---both on 23.0.91.2 and 23.0.60.1,
but not on 22.1.1. So the behaviour did change somewhat, just not the
way I thought it was supposed to change. :-)

  -T.