From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1354: completions-related crash after M-x M-i Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:29:14 -0400 Message-ID: <877i2rokt1.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: Chong Yidong , 1354@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1237067044 28024 80.91.229.12 (14 Mar 2009 21:44:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:44:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1354@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 14 22:45:19 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LibfT-0007CE-Ix for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:45:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56391 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Libe6-0006Kx-TY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:43:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Libe2-0006KZ-FW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:43:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Libdx-0006Jy-0F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:43:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38026 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Libdw-0006Jq-UL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:43:44 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:39914) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Libdw-0004ci-Do for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:43:44 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n2ELhgZZ024685; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:43:42 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n2ELU2Gg020718; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:30:02 -0700 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Chong Yidong Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 1354 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1354-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1354.123706607920603 (code B ref 1354); Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1354) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 14 Mar 2009 21:27:59 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n2ELRuPW020597 for <1354@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:27:57 -0700 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A39A257E211; Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:29:14 -0400 (EDT) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 17:43:49 -0400 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:26327 Archived-At: > I cannot repeat this bug at will, but I've seen it quite a few times > already, and the circumstances are always the same: Trying to run a > command whose name starts with "i" (mostly ielm, in my case) I type > "M-x M-i" instead of "M-x i". I don't know why it doesn't happen every > time, though. Do you still observe this problem? If so, any luck debugging it?