From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.orgmode,gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: can't see emphasized text in org Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:06:41 +0800 Message-ID: <877hwucy5q.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20090823183402.GB20401@dg> <4A918D71.4030809@nickbell.org> <20090823211052.GB8346@dg> <28056.1251066657@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1251068883 26060 80.91.229.12 (23 Aug 2009 23:08:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 23:08:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Original-X-From: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 24 01:07:56 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MfMAD-0001Yv-P5 for geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:07:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52014 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MfMAC-0006Q8-Ow for geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:07:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MfM9e-0006Mv-Dx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:07:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MfM9Y-00069i-PV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:07:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37375 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MfM9U-00060G-NB; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:07:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ew0-f211.google.com ([209.85.219.211]:47348) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MfM9U-0002wy-I4; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:07:08 -0400 Original-Received: by ewy7 with SMTP id 7so1979504ewy.31 for ; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:07:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=eeEH73oK5wWZJYn3l/x2xqYF7D9OAsMoaB+LY7K/uU0=; b=GBMjw7UWXPnCMLyssUSUwzBIJI7NVdfwzD2Y5/Ofy8JzJVtGQaUyTcDTP1vTkOi64u gr2dKlK7kX5wPe9tqbCUhiHTm1eP6IbtF9X/yjU+ILVATpQvulvjsOgdhrt8OANkyUT1 Fxh1XPQPS+qWGDmt3K7Pdqdik6pK8mhy1SlZo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=JnvqeeqwHicoEvzztxA9HKH+JfARtjNDIM+TbrVHrY/Sf5TAJTGTGkJMfWSE9zrbhu pEHgdXtndeVmPOTZ7GAl1/eNO4DsLCQlS9bQz5IgFxky2OpRQgCToBxx3FPaw1oUgV53 MCYYAR3G2aCgrF/ATmMtZkGuzwAZGOmP6eW+E= Original-Received: by 10.210.141.5 with SMTP id o5mr4028854ebd.89.1251068823543; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:07:03 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx (AMontsouris-551-1-107-173.w86-212.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.212.58.173]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm9310204eyg.2.2009.08.23.16.07.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:07:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <28056.1251066657@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> (Nick Dokos's message of "Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:30:57 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.orgmode:16807 gmane.emacs.bugs:30507 Archived-At: Nick Dokos writes: > *Why* it falls back to underlining is probably a question > that should be addressed to the emacs developers, but it looks like > a bug to me (hence copied to the emacs bugs list - version info > appended[2]) Wow, thanks for tracking this down! I'm not sure I would consider the fallback on underline a bug. As I understand it, the "italic" face is equivalent to the LaTeX "emphasize" -- which means that the font has to be more readable in any fashion, either by slanting the text or by underlining it. This is an incorrect use of "italic" but I guess fixing this would break things backward. Thanks again for the helpful information, -- Bastien _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: can't see emphasized text in org Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:06:41 +0800 Message-ID: <877hwucy5q.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20090823183402.GB20401@dg> <4A918D71.4030809@nickbell.org> <20090823211052.GB8346@dg> <28056.1251066657@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MfM9e-0006Mv-Dx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:07:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MfM9Y-00069i-PV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:07:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <28056.1251066657@gamaville.dokosmarshall.org> (Nick Dokos's message of "Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:30:57 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: nicholas.dokos@hp.com Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nick Dokos writes: > *Why* it falls back to underlining is probably a question > that should be addressed to the emacs developers, but it looks like > a bug to me (hence copied to the emacs bugs list - version info > appended[2]) Wow, thanks for tracking this down! I'm not sure I would consider the fallback on underline a bug. As I understand it, the "italic" face is equivalent to the LaTeX "emphasize" -- which means that the font has to be more readable in any fashion, either by slanting the text or by underlining it. This is an incorrect use of "italic" but I guess fixing this would break things backward. Thanks again for the helpful information, -- Bastien