From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Guile in Emacs Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:36:12 +0200 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <877ho9p3pv.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> References: <4B8147A9.7030504@gmail.com> <873a0cyv3r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87aauiho3y.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <1271028837.6164.55.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> <1271102739.6067.38.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> <8039yz34ka.fsf@tiny.isode.net> <1271173887.6067.53.camel@dell-desktop.example.com> <87FA5F05CB9C41409B9E72BD06D7C8CF@us.oracle.com> <87fx2xp839.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271317058 13385 80.91.229.12 (15 Apr 2010 07:37:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 07:37:38 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 15 09:37:37 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2Jdn-0007Rf-EK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:37:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52134 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2Jdm-0003md-Rh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 03:37:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O2Jco-0003iu-P8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 03:36:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46282 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2Jcj-0003hh-Ew for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 03:36:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2Jcg-0001sp-OZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 03:36:29 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:58269) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2Jcg-0001rc-3m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 03:36:26 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2Jcd-0006vH-SB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:36:23 +0200 Original-Received: from p5b2c20ce.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.44.32.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:36:23 +0200 Original-Received: from dak by p5b2c20ce.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:36:23 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5b2c20ce.dip.t-dialin.net X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.92 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:abQs9iJ9dIO9dZxZWnl4ofKIv/4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123688 Archived-At: writes: >>>>>> "David" == David Kastrup writes: > > David> The manuals of an editor with a user-accessible extension > David> language (with Emacs, this is the case for Elisp but not for C) > David> need to document this extension language. > > Of course, but there is no reason why this information cannot be split > across several manuals and having the CL parts be documented by > respectively the CL standard (eg. the hyperspec) and whatever other > documentation exists for the CL implementation chosen to host emacs. Did you bother to read my posting to its end before replying to the first sentence? I should think that I already addressed this. -- David Kastrup