From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Window configurations Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 20:09:09 +0300 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <877hmezpvu.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <4BB4CF6B.2000007@alice.it> <87zl0rtmqy.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <871vdu6qn5.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87bpcv1wvt.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4BE13828.2030609@gmx.at> <87vdb2qo82.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4BE27C17.3030005@gmx.at> <87vdav4vx5.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4BE900E7.3090402@gmx.at> <87r5liqv8f.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4BEA74DC.2060103@gmx.at> <87y6fns8qo.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4BECF4D6.9030707@gmx.at> <87632na2af.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4C03F1B5.8040708@gmx.at> <4C04D1BF.9070902@gmx.at> <87zkzcse1j.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4C08B53C.7040304@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275671620 5176 80.91.229.12 (4 Jun 2010 17:13:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 17:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , Emacs To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 04 19:13:32 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKaSZ-0006Kq-Il for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:13:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41557 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OKaSY-0002jX-SQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:13:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54247 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OKaOl-0000yj-22 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:09:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKaOj-0007Vh-Dq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:09:34 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-out1.starman.ee ([85.253.0.3]:51384 helo=mx1.starman.ee) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OKaOj-0007VY-6z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:09:33 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-New at mx1.starman.ee Original-Received: from mail.starman.ee (82.131.96.205.cable.starman.ee [82.131.96.205]) by mx1.starman.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB6F3F413B; Fri, 4 Jun 2010 20:09:28 +0300 (EEST) In-Reply-To: <4C08B53C.7040304@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:11:40 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125517 Archived-At: >> There is another case that is more annoying: >> >> 1. Run `emacs -q', the current buffer is "*scratch*". >> >> 2. Type `C-h i', the current buffer is "*info*". >> >> 3. Type `C-h C-t', the current buffer is "TODO". >> >> 4. Type `C-h C-n', the current buffer is "NEWS". >> >> 5. Type `C-x k RET', the current buffer is the previous buffer "TODO", good. >> >> 6. Type `C-x k RET', the current buffer is "*scratch*". Why? >> The previous buffer is "*info*", not "*scratch*"! > > This happened in revision 90833 of `pop-to-buffer' from 2008-09-13. > Since then `pop-to-buffer' doesn't reselect the selected window. > > The culprit is this conditional > > (unless (eq new-window old-window) > ;; `display-buffer' has chosen another window, select it. > > which does not select the *info* window because it was already selected > before but obviously doesn't record the *info* buffer either :-( > > I'm running my code without the conditional for more than two months > now so it shouldn't harm if you remove it as well. I tried to remove the conditional, but it doesn't help. Maybe some other your changes fixed that? -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/