From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: CEDET discoverability (was: Emacs learning curve) Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:44:00 +0200 Message-ID: <877hkze69r.fsf_-_@telefonica.net> References: <4C3B6A8A.80105@gmx.de> <87wrt0e81n.fsf@telefonica.net> <62E9699C07054418AB66F9C5FCB54E5C@us.oracle.com> <87sk3oe3la.fsf@telefonica.net> <1154D96E7D2F401D849266F359E44BB9@us.oracle.com> <87ocecdzou.fsf@telefonica.net> <87hbk4i1m4.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87bpacdpwl.fsf@telefonica.net> <878w5fizcb.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <4C3C553D.9090203@siege-engine.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279035871 15661 80.91.229.12 (13 Jul 2010 15:44:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 15:44:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Eric M. Ludlam" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 13 17:44:29 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYhei-00035l-QW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:44:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50266 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OYhef-0002Nl-V4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:44:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37689 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OYhea-0002MV-0O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:44:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYheV-0008Gg-5z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:44:15 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:37998) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYheU-0008GH-Vc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:44:11 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OYheT-0002yx-1b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:44:09 +0200 Original-Received: from 83.42.13.171 ([83.42.13.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:44:09 +0200 Original-Received: from ofv by 83.42.13.171 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:44:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.42.13.171 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:kIFdaOzIzVMQMdUZLFRArCyJBRc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127187 Archived-At: "Eric M. Ludlam" writes: [snip] > One of the things I was most surprised by was that when CEDET was > integrated into Emacs, only 2 people tried it and reported anything > from this list. I fixed those things too. Now this list is posting > things that effectively pretend CEDET doesn't exist. What's up with > that? Where on the Emacs documentation can I learn about CEDET? On an Emacs compiled a few days ago, I did M-h i S cedet [ENTER] and it turned nothing. M-x cedet [TAB] returns nothing too. I tried CEDET several years ago with my C++ projects and it was of no use (slow, highly inaccurate, slowed down text editing.) I'm sure things have improved a lot since that experience (the CEDET docs mentioned that its C++ support was very rough) and I'll like to try again. Guess that I must go to the CEDET website.