From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7334: 24.0.50; Segfault when deleting a frame Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:14:35 -0500 Message-ID: <877hghm9hg.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1289670302 11186 80.91.229.12 (13 Nov 2010 17:45:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:45:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7334@debbugs.gnu.org To: Julien Danjou Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 13 18:44:58 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHK9p-0005vM-9x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 18:44:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58883 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PHK9o-0000Ks-QJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:44:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49978 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PHK9d-0000Kb-MD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:44:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PHK90-00087h-W0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:44:45 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44165) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PHK90-00087d-UJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:44:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHJc2-0002m3-D8; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:10:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7334 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7334-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7334.128966819010652 (code B ref 7334); Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7334) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Nov 2010 17:09:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHJbp-0002ll-KH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:09:49 -0500 Original-Received: from pantheon-po25.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.119]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHJbn-0002lg-8R for 7334@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:09:47 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (c-71-192-165-84.hsd1.ct.comcast.net [71.192.165.84]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po25.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id oADHEagw028400 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:14:36 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4681B16062F; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:14:35 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Julien Danjou's message of "Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:41:24 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:10:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41557 Archived-At: Julien Danjou writes: > On Fri, Nov 05 2010, Julien Danjou wrote: > >> Here's the backtrace. > > Here's another one, fresh from this morning: Could you play around with it and try to find a recipe for reproducing the bug? Backtraces by themselves are not much to go on, especially since these ones seem to happen deep in GTK. At the least, describe what you were doing when you got the crash.