From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: smtpmail and ~/.authinfo Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:40:07 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <877h4v14a0.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <83ippsqsz8.fsf@gnu.org> <83hb5ay1rs.fsf@gnu.org> <87litc7qen.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pqio69lr.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vcsf1537.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83wrcvf682.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317066037 23459 80.91.229.12 (26 Sep 2011 19:40:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 19:40:37 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 26 21:40:34 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R8H2W-0008ER-E1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:40:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34773 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R8H2W-0002uO-1D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:40:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57357) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R8H2T-0002uF-C8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:40:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R8H2S-0002T6-4Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:40:29 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:48422) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R8H2R-0002T1-UT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:40:28 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R8H2P-0008C7-1E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:40:25 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.133 ([38.98.147.133]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:40:25 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.133 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:40:25 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.133 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:YLRuM6g98Cmr7bQuMuaFHMmFppg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144346 Archived-At: On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:34:21 +0300 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Ted Zlatanov >> Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:22:36 -0500 >> >> I believe random bytes can be encoded just fine by UTF-8. EZ> No, they cannot. A given sequence of "random bytes" can be a valid EZ> UTF-8 encoding of some character with a sufficiently large code point. But that's not what I said :) They can be *encoded* to a UTF-8 sequence than can be eventually decoded back from UTF-8. Ted