From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: AUCTeX conflicting with org-mode
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:23:03 +0100
Message-ID: <877gyfkzrs.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAMXnza0mCFfMzj8MKyCBf9raF0iysVfBAdHELfHPC9=_EP6yJg@mail.gmail.com>
	<yagnesh@live.com> <87sjhlxako.fsf@live.com>
	<20423.1331134740@alphaville> <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
	<CAMXnza0bKGUyeH27t_==QXfNYB5ZDyHS9diTfHDYCEsLS+1_cQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<3555.1331150405@alphaville>
	<CAMXnza0L3JQkLZLGi_rT7mZ8yVNV2T-QarGmp+9_GRRFfzRzMg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4125.1331159402@alphaville> <87399jo9go.fsf@live.com>
	<87r4wnpmbn.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAMXnza1Bo5G5GXkcPwENcttdjXWLQR2kEM6UJkjW6Xjsv6VrJw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43600)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>)
	id 1SA1oh-0002Nm-FW
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:21:48 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>) id 1SA1of-0005Vz-N5
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:21:47 -0400
Received: from incoming2.cnam.fr ([163.173.128.34]:20900)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>)
	id 1SA1of-0005Vs-HY
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:21:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAMXnza1Bo5G5GXkcPwENcttdjXWLQR2kEM6UJkjW6Xjsv6VrJw@mail.gmail.com>
	(suvayu ali's message of "Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:48:23 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Yagnesh Raghava Yakkala <yagnesh@live.com>

Hi Suvayu,

suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com> writes:

> I wanted to comment earlier but it slipped my mind, sorry about that.
>
> I am not sure if this patch is quite corect. It removes the let bind and
> instead conditionally uses setq to bind it to t. From the docs I see the
> variable becomes buffer local when set in any fashion, but does that
> still mean it is okay to use setq?
>
> I can imagine in a complicated publishing project, an org file might
> need to set the value to something. I suppose this will override any
> such custom config. Is my analysis correct? It might be worth thinking
> about before applying the patch.
>
> Is a conditional let binding possible, it might be the safer choice in
> that case.

I applied a patch into hotfix-7.8.06 using the let binding -- let me
know if this works correctly.

Thanks!

-- 
 Bastien