From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10580: 24.0.92; gdb initialization takes more than one minute at 100% CPU Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 00:25:00 +0800 Message-ID: <877gwm3ajn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20253.9861.848886.122482@fencepost.gnu.org> <87aa1mj69x.fsf@gnu.org> <87havtvpeb.fsf@gnu.org> <874nrsem67.fsf@gnu.org> <874nrswme9.fsf@gnu.org> <87zk9kv75l.fsf@gnu.org> <87mx5j6pqs.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1336494367 9881 80.91.229.3 (8 May 2012 16:26:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 16:26:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10580@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dov Grobgeld Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 08 18:26:05 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SRnEi-0002ht-KX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 18:26:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55473 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRnEi-0005ci-0g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 12:26:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43369) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRnEe-0005c1-Q8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 12:26:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRnEZ-0004Dd-IC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 12:26:00 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40324) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRnEZ-0004DV-EZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 12:25:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SRnGb-0002oK-Jx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 12:28:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 16:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10580 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10580-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10580.133649444510762 (code B ref 10580); Tue, 08 May 2012 16:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10580) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 May 2012 16:27:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41358 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SRnFz-0002nV-0g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 12:27:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:52061 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SRnFw-0002nN-4N for 10580@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 May 2012 12:27:21 -0400 Original-Received: from cm162.gamma80.maxonline.com.sg ([202.156.80.162]:55123 helo=ulysses) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRnDq-0002SD-Qi; Tue, 08 May 2012 12:25:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Dov Grobgeld's message of "Tue, 8 May 2012 14:59:36 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.96 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59863 Archived-At: Dov Grobgeld writes: > Indeed, my result is much fatter. > > (safe-length gdb-debug-log) => 223 > > and the total length of the messages is about 800k. So it seems that > the time spent is simply the parsing of this large chunk of data? What > gdb command is run that outputs all the file="..." commands? Those are status messages from turning on GDB's MI (machine interface) system, I think, though I don't see why it makes so much difference in your case. If you type, from the shell, gdb -i=mi YOUR-BINARY r do you similarly see a huge output?