From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CEDET version Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:38:39 +0100 Message-ID: <877gn42vsw.fsf@engster.org> References: <87txqgjfmx.fsf@mail36.net> <9c38xzv0q7.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <76ehhjw8bb.fsf_-_@fencepost.gnu.org> <87wqv62vu1.fsf@engster.org> <0ca9s2ht87.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <50FE1044.1010307@siege-engine.com> <50FF17E0.8090208@siege-engine.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1358928879 24643 80.91.229.3 (23 Jan 2013 08:14:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:14:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Eric M. Ludlam" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 23 09:14:57 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TxvTx-0005wA-Os for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:14:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34951 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxvTg-0005NT-Du for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 03:14:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxvTd-0005Ms-Vh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 03:14:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TxvTc-0007W4-Cl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 03:14:33 -0500 Original-Received: from randomsample.de ([83.169.19.17]:46608) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Txuv1-0006N0-JP; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 02:38:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=randomsample.de; s=a; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=wpGcTfKQxC9IJd+/ar0HfbxC8WlH2/AbUwINJMQkMNM=; b=jSEyE+D1zdqdriH5ERe/GaeLY/NvlkFrTQxLDt5o9WwVV+5WdKfjEVqQ8HOOmsaV+mdCIE2rO7QcZuE0OY/G4CvDXH+LUB0NTkhWN8dJ7nsHlW9nn7yeC8z7dGpwL6sJ; Original-Received: from dslc-082-083-042-050.pools.arcor-ip.net ([82.83.42.50] helo=spaten) by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Txuuy-00057u-Gh; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 08:38:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: <50FF17E0.8090208@siege-engine.com> (Eric M. Ludlam's message of "Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:51:12 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Followup-To: "Eric M. Ludlam" , Glenn Morris , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 83.169.19.17 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156596 Archived-At: Eric M. Ludlam writes: > Ah, thanks for clarifying. I hadn't realized the comment and variable > were going out of sync. A side-effect of using an incomplete script. > I can update the script to keep those in sync in the future the CEDET > repository. The variable is the correct version. > > I'm not certain about the 'beta' though. I usually put a number after > the beta, like 2.1beta1 or some such. OK, but what should be done now? If you bump the numbers in CEDET upstream to a stable version, I can merge that change to the emacs-24 branch. For the future, I'd rather get rid of all those separate version numbers for all the sub-packages. They may have been useful back in the day, but I don't think they're worth the hassle now. Let's just have one CEDET version and be done with it. -David