From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: return does not follow link Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 20:10:06 +0100 Message-ID: <877gmipqpd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48280) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3tKx-0002Z0-QW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 14:10:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3tKu-00020L-Re for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 14:10:15 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]:42060) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U3tKu-0001wT-KC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 14:10:12 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hm6so1242500wib.8 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 11:10:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Alan E. Davis's message of "Fri, 8 Feb 2013 11:05:43 -0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Alan E. Davis" Cc: org-mode Hi Alan, "Alan E. Davis" writes: > By the way, even C-cC-o returns this same problem on my system. (It looks like your first message didn't make it to the list... or maybe the server had a hiccup.) > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Alan E. Davis > wrote: > > My setup is extremely convoluted, I fear, so I will not submit > this as a bug report.   > > When I type at a link to an org-mode link (it is in > another file), the following is seen in the minibuffer: > >     Running less ...done > > I updated org-mode from git, and reset org-return-follows-path by > customization, and this situation persists. > > Can anyone suggest where to look? Where does "Running less" come from? Can you just send a minimal.org with produces the error with emacs -Q? Thanks! -- Bastien