From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r116108: * automated/file-notify-tests.el (file-notify-test02-events): Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:18:28 +0100 Message-ID: <877g9sp0az.fsf@gmx.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390400326 23565 80.91.229.3 (22 Jan 2014 14:18:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:18:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 22 15:18:52 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W5ydm-0003yv-7J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:18:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35307 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5ydl-0007o7-Kk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:18:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37122) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5ydd-0007nw-LC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:18:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5ydW-0004G3-Ee for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:18:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:64455) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W5ydW-0004Fv-53 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:18:34 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([93.209.85.60]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPS (Nemesis) id 0MDE6y-1W76gO2VBc-00GV9D for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:18:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:49:38 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:c/y7HKchy2rAIqbPvPitAeTMPI8vvykUODqbkac9KufxEsSerFy PpaU1SnbGOs+YggrNuVBdSGwB5vHVgodBimlKdJemn2EUbbdWjtpJrIuprV3yJnE8puFQGZ td+fGKTKKmWKvKxxeDKeVFV1+NL/fOlVSyGviaEWS91f3Vu1KVDkjzQFYmMMkqtad53vl5Q wNH4hu3sxCARvc1IHN0zA== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168889 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> + (should >> + (or file-notify--test-results >> + (and noninteractive (eq file-notify--library 'gfilenotify)))) ;; >> Bug#16519. > > Of course, "the right" way to say it is via a ":expected-failure" or > something like that. I know. However, this test case contains a complex scenario, and I like to still run the other steps. ":expected-result" must be the first form in the test body, and would prevent this. (Alternatively, one could split the test case, but well ...) I'm working on the problem, so I hope to fix it soon. > Stefan Best regards, Michael.