Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r116108: * automated/file-notify-tests.el (file-notify-test02-events):

[Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de>]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> +  (should
>> +   (or file-notify--test-results
>> + (and noninteractive (eq file-notify--library 'gfilenotify)))) ;;
>> Bug#16519.
>
> Of course, "the right" way to say it is via a ":expected-failure" or
> something like that.

I know. However, this test case contains a complex scenario, and I like
to still run the other steps. ":expected-result" must be the first form
in the test body, and would prevent this. (Alternatively, one could
split the test case, but well ...)

I'm working on the problem, so I hope to fix it soon.

>         Stefan

Best regards, Michael.