From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14926: 24.3.50; Warning "`make-variable-buffer-local' should be called at toplevel" Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 21:28:55 -0800 Message-ID: <877g962mw8.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <2aaa3bfa-1556-4135-b70a-1308e6cc7cdd@default> <8738qb816m.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391837470 27695 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2014 05:31:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 05:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14926@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 08 06:31:17 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WC0VZ-000095-14 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 06:31:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45079 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC0VY-00064N-Kn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 00:31:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37284) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC0VQ-00062x-4L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 00:31:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC0VK-0007Sn-Pu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 00:31:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42074) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC0VK-0007Si-ND for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 00:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC0VK-00038S-7k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 00:31:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14926 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14926-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14926.13918374239321 (code B ref 14926); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14926) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 05:30:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56090 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC0Ug-0002PU-LQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 00:30:23 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:45547) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC0Ue-0002MH-76 for 14926@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 00:30:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WC0UO-0005lv-0u; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 06:30:04 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:45:18 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WC0UO-0005lv-0u MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392442206.38493@BcZ3KAwBiIXVQW2mkoy0VQ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84891 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Glenn Morris wrote: > >> Done. Of course, it won't remotely satisfy the OP. > > FWIW, looking at the change I've had the same reaction as Drew. > > The message still suggests that using make-variable-buffer-local other > than at toplevel is erroneous. > > It should say something like > > Use of make-variable-buffer-local other than at top-level could be > an error; perhaps you wanted to use make-local-variable? > > only shortish and better redacted. The doc string of `make-variable-buffer-local' mentions the later function, so I think that's sufficient for people who wants to know more about the warning. Closing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/