From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17446: 24.4.50; What is the situation around `called-interactively-p'? Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 20:01:20 +0200 Message-ID: <877g5ki8sv.fsf@web.de> References: <87tx8z6sp2.fsf@gmail.com> <819a6ab8-db8e-4176-a778-02218f08e7af@default> <6e5610f3-d741-4d61-903c-a8f3aa8f46fd@default> <87siojasqx.fsf@web.de> <87r442x00n.fsf@gmail.com> <87bnv6mba5.fsf@gmail.com> <87r442f46r.fsf@gmail.com> <87siohx7rg.fsf@web.de> <878uq8luvj.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1400349752 16895 80.91.229.3 (17 May 2014 18:02:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 18:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17446@debbugs.gnu.org, Thierry Volpiatto To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 17 20:02:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wliw9-0001ez-0V for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 20:02:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41071 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wliw8-0001LU-Lf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 14:02:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58589) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wlivy-0001LG-IP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 14:02:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wlivr-0006Kg-1d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 14:02:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52823) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wlivq-0006Kc-UF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 14:02:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wlivq-00007k-4M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 14:02:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 18:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17446 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17446-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17446.1400349702442 (code B ref 17446); Sat, 17 May 2014 18:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17446) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 May 2014 18:01:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51700 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WlivV-000073-8U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 14:01:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:63543) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WlivR-00006o-Ob for 17446@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 14:01:38 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([90.187.32.12]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6mL2-1Wxm5b46K4-00wVUH; Sat, 17 May 2014 20:01:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: <878uq8luvj.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Sun, 11 May 2014 07:58:08 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.90 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:2wrLdBBI8VCsKExptP3VSsTZuFVsuE9dEhP4FvhL9yJ0VEyQLI1 TeYozmX9MfZsXHIUKRVIlNaE6dTEpdeGL4nrPt2TSOWTCOG5IqApEJ9aaicghlFnAHzO41B CjhEGHe58CtSoQST+Xxwvl4whn4QZG+ye54nwhojV6TdExQIFAum+Ks8PT3HB9RUvgy2Fvj vjsyIeIpbGeBqk5lJLQeA== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:89198 Archived-At: Hi, my last question was: should `repeat-complex-command' set `this-command'? See my example. If the answer is "yes" - shall I create a separate bug report? Thanks, Michael. > Example: > > (defvar the-string nil) > > (defun test (string) > (interactive (list (if (eq this-command last-command) > the-string > (setq the-string (read-string "Enter string: "))))) > (message (concat "You " > (if (eq this-command last-command) "had" "have") > " entered " > the-string))) > > (global-set-key [f12] #'test) > > If you repeat `test' via repeat-complex-command and hit f12 after that, > it doesn't behave as expected (i.e., message "You had entered ..."). > Should it?