From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ivan Shmakov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19865: tar-untar-buffer: should honor default-directory Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:32:59 +0000 Message-ID: <877fvkbdpw.fsf@violet.siamics.net> References: <87a90gd91b.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <87fva8bi4v.fsf@violet.siamics.net> <83h9uowhxh.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423935270 4444 80.91.229.3 (14 Feb 2015 17:34:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:34:30 +0000 (UTC) To: 19865@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 14 18:34:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YMgbd-0003pN-44 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:34:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60634 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMgbc-0001Mj-Es for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:34:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45943) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMgbY-0001LZ-9U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:34:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMgbT-0001Mh-BD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:34:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52852) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMgbS-0001MJ-4e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:34:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMgbR-0004jj-TY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:34:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ivan Shmakov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:34:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19865 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 19865-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19865.142393519218144 (code B ref 19865); Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:34:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19865) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2015 17:33:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44092 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMgae-0004iZ-1t for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:33:12 -0500 Original-Received: from fely.am-1.org ([78.47.74.50]:43832) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMgaa-0004iP-IP for 19865@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:33:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=siamics.net; s=a2013295; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:Sender:References:Subject:To:From; bh=5a+nwQEOCwoV5Bthe2NCBbHPdEtz/Kih0+Su/hBaDwQ=; b=azLtCOOwzGztKY5vbYZJb9BrAYuXgG/5NFNtkUdG+Tp5Qn9YRGMmnbAsAAgZD8qKqTEUEYZ/xufqnJynRze5ydGd4PVPkfc2JI4a1ITb20aG7UxmDzaW2qxYZqCwj8A6xzV0fSwUJfTraDLxWi3M5Agom2V+oNclWF/nI6afBRA=; Original-Received: from [2a02:2560:6d4:26ca::1:1d] (helo=violet.siamics.net) by fely.am-1.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMgaZ-00041Q-AE for 19865@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:33:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=violet.siamics.net) by violet.siamics.net with esmtps (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YMgaS-0002jG-D8 for 19865@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 00:33:00 +0700 Mail-Followup-To: 19865@debbugs.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <83h9uowhxh.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:56:26 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99400 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >>>>> From: Ivan Shmakov Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:57:36 +0000 >> Well, let=E2=80=99s see if I can reword the report. > If all you want is for me to stop bothering you with comments, all > you need is just ask. There's no need to have the bug reports > reworded around my comments. All I want is to get the issue (that is: the misbehavior of tar-untar-buffer with respect to the tar-mode buffer value of default-directory) fixed. From where I stand, the shortest way there seems to get either of my two patches approved (that is: at least a single OK and no NAKs), so that I can safely push it. If there=E2=80=99s any other way I should be aware of =E2=80=93 I=E2=80=99d like to hear about it. My understanding is that the Stefan=E2=80=99s comment is an OK (for a former patch), while your request for =E2=80=9Csomeone third to resolve the tie=E2=80=9D is a NAK (please correct me if it=E2=80=99s not.) I appreciate the comments regarding the possible new =E2=80=9Cexplicit destination directory=E2=80=9D feature, and I guess I can work on a possible implementation once /this/ issue =E2=80=93 and also #19481 =E2=80= =93 are fixed. However, I believe that such a new feature is no substitute for a proper fix to this bug. Thanks again for your participation in this discussion. --=20 FSF associate member #7257 http://boycottsystemd.org/ =E2=80=A6 3013 B6A0= 230E 334A