From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21565: 25.0.50; ediff-regions-wordwise fails on latex files Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:02:37 +0200 Message-ID: <877fndr1si.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <87r3lm700d.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <83lhbthb2g.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Uwe Brauer NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1443258208 32398 80.91.229.3 (26 Sep 2015 09:03:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 09:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21565@debbugs.gnu.org, Uwe Brauer To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 26 11:03:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZflNw-0001KB-0e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 11:03:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52514 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZflNv-0004ss-OS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 05:03:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39294) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZflNr-0004sf-JH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 05:03:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZflNm-0001AS-Hd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 05:03:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54985) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZflNm-0001AD-Fa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 05:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZflNm-00013o-2K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 05:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87r3lm700d.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Resent-From: Uwe Brauer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 09:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21565 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21565-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21565.14432581684057 (code B ref 21565); Sat, 26 Sep 2015 09:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21565) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Sep 2015 09:02:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43956 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZflNY-00013N-55 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 05:02:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com ([209.85.212.171]:35663) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZflNV-00013E-IE for 21565@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 05:02:46 -0400 Original-Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so47820610wic.0 for <21565@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 02:02:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mat.ucm.es; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=ybs5+t1tIxzaWl/NM+idcdsCJCx9o2en8pTbpgIhNI0=; b=kf6V/IWajJw7BqprgbXTaBKLTc/IxSvBNHj3AgWOXk/j2PVGoklFHGcmJuxL6m5c/Z Cc1cHna6cPhzVW5F75vf4dG0bdX7YAQNayl0NLeci0HyZOHVkDSMC9rmtISOPb7yO+Gg 39Ch/RzywhuNrSnkD82u9IDexyjHCexLYEYyA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:date :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=ybs5+t1tIxzaWl/NM+idcdsCJCx9o2en8pTbpgIhNI0=; b=Yp+5fx4OaPiyohC+wz3w9aTI+PQ8aUP9qxzqH1XPF9zMsQHP1nkU2jRDa0yRp5P18C jv7HlBQUoY36OdWIwe4vsRq1UwbsSOXLGlaMAOYFNJ6fdXigPRmJjEvcLcZYmbTFVXod 9ITVVRJoW+WF5uUKt4Xerc4EXvKUahPT/P4fROOsDMtKIxzDxZZd4MpdqH9ZNCGPrGui II87inNUKvgs0N3OHd3uS9IoPU07ra5Wx7SUa1lTEkKqla6Wbs8TySLllTXK98ZqhUBa EDYU+Dcdrye6mTWnv1oYFZOaDlfuH3pOc7QpQa68n8FDdmpCollgulgPjt7x76u1/GI0 tD+g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk0Q17JKoMcLW1QpW9+ceT0EbwBFSXARu3koIlgJiCu3ZdaQu0yaqP0r3nMuoSXf2zLzhfE X-Received: by 10.181.13.102 with SMTP id ex6mr8015247wid.64.1443258164471; Sat, 26 Sep 2015 02:02:44 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Gilgamesch ([2.162.6.167]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lb10sm7429485wjc.9.2015.09.26.02.02.42 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 26 Sep 2015 02:02:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: emacs 25.0.50.1 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) X-Hashcash: 1:20:150926:21565@debbugs.gnu.org::45Qlcy+3aMQwegLO:00000000000000000000000000000000000000001Ywv X-Hashcash: 1:20:150926:eliz@gnu.org::rHZ0sNTCWqhWJMHX:000002jTG X-Hashcash: 1:20:150926:oub@mat.ucm.es::DeMnt9yUwp32iql/:0005i87 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:106928 Archived-At: > I cannot reproduce this in "emacs -Q" with today's Git master. Does > this happen to you in "emacs -Q" with any 2 buffers, not necessarily > in AUC TeX mode? Or is AUC TeX a necessary part of this problem? (I > tried 2 buffers in C Mode.) I did not try emacs -Q, because then it is difficult for me to send the bug report, since the smtp server is configured. I also use ediff-region-wordwise either in mail or in Latex(auctex) buffers. > Also, you seem to have a private jit-lock package: > /home/oub/emacs/jit-lock hides /opt/emacs25/share/emacs/25.0.50/lisp/jit-lock I deleted it > which perhaps could be part of this problem. > In general, the error seems to indicate one of the regions was absent > (so no mark in that buffer), so presenting a detailed sequence of > commands and keystrokes leading to the problem might also shed some > light on this. (Reporting the bug immediately after it happened and > from the same Emacs session would have captured your last keystrokes > and included them in the report.) Ok I did this, starting emacs -Q and working in a latex buffer (in that case auctex is not used but the plain latex mode emacs still ships) I therefore send another bug report and you might close this one, thanks.