From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Matthias Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21934: 24.5; find-tag: reading TAGS file incorrectly Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 18:49:32 +0100 Message-ID: <877fl9sz4j.fsf@winky.hogwarts> References: <87ziyd20cb.fsf@winky.hogwarts> <564AA697.9000203@yandex.ru> <83egfj4i2b.fsf@gnu.org> <56511795.2050207@yandex.ru> <83si3y2et4.fsf@gnu.org> <5651F350.6080203@yandex.ru> <83h9ke2av1.fsf@gnu.org> <5651FED4.8080508@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448214632 1252 80.91.229.3 (22 Nov 2015 17:50:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 17:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21934@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 22 18:50:20 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a0YmG-0003ch-KS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 18:50:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56947 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0YmB-0003dV-KE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 12:50:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42287) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0Ym8-0003bJ-3L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 12:50:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0Ym2-0002TX-TD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 12:50:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58759) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0Ym2-0002TS-Pi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 12:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a0Ym2-00068z-IZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 12:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas Matthias Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 17:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21934 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21934-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21934.144821459123586 (code B ref 21934); Sun, 22 Nov 2015 17:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21934) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2015 17:49:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48467 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a0Ylq-00068K-HT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 12:49:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:33269) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a0YlW-00067f-Hm for 21934@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 12:49:49 -0500 Original-Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so132397849wme.0 for <21934@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 09:49:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=VvPN7hRw69ltrTx+HkGDFb/5eTHWmalnXRCYJeTRWuM=; b=XBVcPGW333Bdu44b5hWdQZNIIzug200GiYlYHPFYHxt3vvCZEBG6mycrSf5OWco6J+ p8289/5WB3H9HFOUkn+znRkbePcS1B557M6U8FIXD/1dfselX3Zu72aLOAMjoimHI65B EhrorlJ5ekSgF0GlrIX2f8t5Mnmpwyh2rxR8e6U14amj2ewxm1iU3tKkSks5VFhrGnLp hPgsdkIaR1YZoQ8ZO6M45gbiRJEUxkwgAo39Wolq2TgKKCQWpgYyw6X+uYnvPm/5SQK/ ZCKrE2Qmp6TWrGx2ZSQotwbiHt33766E/VCzOAQlGb/2etamBpjyy7unE4xOzEPJsLqN ILFA== X-Received: by 10.28.93.70 with SMTP id r67mr14033816wmb.16.1448214569893; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 09:49:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from winky.hogwarts (HSI-KBW-109-193-111-125.hsi7.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de. [109.193.111.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c194sm9430759wmd.13.2015.11.22.09.49.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 22 Nov 2015 09:49:29 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by winky.hogwarts (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E96016E061E; Sun, 22 Nov 2015 18:49:32 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <5651FED4.8080508@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Sun, 22 Nov 2015 19:43:48 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109089 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov wrote: > On 11/22/2015 07:38 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> If that's the conclusion, I think I can make etags do that for Lua. >> >> Should that be done for tokens that include '.' and ':'? > > I think so. Yes, both. >> Can there be >> more than one of these in a token, and if so, what should etags do? >> IOW, if we have foo.bar.baz or foo:bar.baz etc., what should be the >> result? > > Just two, I think. foo.bar is not a function, and bar.baz probably won't be a > "symbol at point". > > So just the fully qualified tag name, and the local tag name ("baz"). Yes, that's reasonable.