From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uwe Brauer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22083: 25.0.50; hg: adding tag enhances the rev, modeline does not reflect Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 19:11:36 +0000 Message-ID: <877fkslnh3.fsf@mat.ucm.es> References: <87h9jzy70u.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <566103DA.2050901@yandex.ru> <83610eioei.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb8eto9d.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <56627F41.3000805@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449342805 31300 80.91.229.3 (5 Dec 2015 19:13:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2015 19:13:25 +0000 (UTC) To: 22083@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 05 20:13:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IGd-0007t7-Rl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 20:13:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47501 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IGc-00066u-OU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:13:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56234) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IGY-00064q-JM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:13:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IGU-00012J-IQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:13:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50386) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IGU-00012F-Er for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:13:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IGT-0002uj-SC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:13:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87h9jzy70u.fsf@mat.ucm.es> Resent-From: Uwe Brauer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2015 19:13:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22083 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.144934272911129 (code B ref -1); Sat, 05 Dec 2015 19:13:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Dec 2015 19:12:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40094 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IFd-0002tQ-5C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:12:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46083) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IFJ-0002sj-Ho for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:12:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IFI-0000v6-L5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:11:49 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:55534) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IFI-0000uz-IP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:11:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56086) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IFH-00056I-Ns for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:11:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IFD-0000pk-ME for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:11:47 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60499) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IFD-0000o6-8M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 14:11:43 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a5IFC-0004vT-1j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 20:11:42 +0100 Original-Received: from 171.pool85-55-19.dynamic.orange.es ([85.55.19.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 20:11:42 +0100 Original-Received: from oub by 171.pool85-55-19.dynamic.orange.es with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 20:11:42 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 75 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 171.pool85-55-19.dynamic.orange.es Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:I4JAQm7SbTy2AuoL/fUEu94hnkI= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109667 Archived-At: > On 12/04/2015 02:02 PM, Uwe Brauer wrote: > Tagging a revision adds a new revision? That looks odd. > I wonder what's going on there. > Is it somehow caused by how we perform the commit in Emacs? Is the > outcome different if you do the commit from the command line? > Do you mean to add the revision hash after the revision number? > How will that change improve the situation with jumping revision > numbers? Will it improve clarity somehow? I mean right now we have in the modeline of a file say, test.tex Hg-7 I do not modify this file but I add a tag and then do either from the command line hg log And I see ,---- | changeset: 8:f38208b6c8e5 | tag: tip | user: Uwe Brauer | date: Sat Dec 05 19:05:34 2015 +0000 | summary: Added tag v1 for changeset c4b41f76e11e | | changeset: 7:c4b41f76e11e | bookmark: format | tag: v1 | user: Uwe Brauer | date: Sun Nov 15 10:34:58 2015 +0000 | summary: format `---- Or I do vc-print-log ,---- | changeset: 7:c4b41f76e11e | tag: v1 | user: Uwe Brauer | Date: Sun Nov 15 10:34:58 2015 +0000 | summary: format `---- Or vc-print-root-log ,---- | 8:::tip:Uwe Brauer 2015-12-05 Added tag v1 for changeset c4b41f76e11e | 7::format:v1:Uwe Brauer 2015-11-15 format `---- Usually I do not use vc-print-root-log very often. So I suggest that the modeline in *that* case (of an added tag) shows Hg-7/8 or Hg-7/8(t)