From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18157: 24.4.50; battery-pmset fails to report critical battery state Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 18:36:47 +1100 Message-ID: <877fhzde9c.fsf@gnus.org> References: <874md81z5z.fsf@amu.edu.pl> <8737ss1arx.fsf@mbork.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455953902 24892 80.91.229.3 (20 Feb 2016 07:38:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:38:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Sebastian Wiesner , 18157@debbugs.gnu.org To: Marcin Borkowski Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 20 08:38:11 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aX27G-0006mH-Lb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:38:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58896 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aX27G-00084V-0r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 02:38:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50182) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aX27C-00081P-DH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 02:38:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aX278-0008Jz-CQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 02:38:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37363) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aX278-0008Jn-8k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 02:38:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aX278-00012C-52 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 02:38:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18157 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18157-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18157.14559538363921 (code B ref 18157); Sat, 20 Feb 2016 07:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18157) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2016 07:37:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34490 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aX26N-00011B-W8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 02:37:16 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:56832) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aX26M-000114-RK for 18157@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 02:37:15 -0500 Original-Received: from cpe-60-225-211-161.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([60.225.211.161] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aX25z-0000RT-OQ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:36:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8737ss1arx.fsf@mbork.pl> (Marcin Borkowski's message of "Wed, 17 Feb 2016 00:43:46 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1aX25z-0000RT-OQ MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1456558612.54233@MndmK4N4li/D71TxMxds1w X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113334 Archived-At: Marcin Borkowski writes: > Also, if I should have behaved differently, please tell me what I could > have done better (apart from the not-so-optimal wording of my message). No, you've done exactly what we hope people would do. Thank you for investigating the problem and providing a patch. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no