From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Patches for Emacs 25.2 Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:09:55 +0200 Message-ID: <877f96t9oc.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1476774618 24872 195.159.176.226 (18 Oct 2016 07:10:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 07:10:18 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 18 09:10:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bwOXI-0005Fi-OX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:10:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39269 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwOXK-0007dL-Q9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 03:10:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47280) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwOXE-0007c1-2I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 03:10:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwOX9-0003Pk-2m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 03:10:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:50727) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwOX8-0003Mp-PQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 03:09:59 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([87.146.53.123]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M5dMm-1ctanc3080-00xao9 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:09:56 +0200 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:CGBW9r6R/1JUmRLABT0DfFfSM22c0iTE074mIWycOjOB7y6/kOU 97D0kPb4AA75/tYVNUCStsjt+HrGxbt1VqFqL9kUG6DA9TuJlQppYSDS7h4TwHqcah8bgSX HExhJFGY4WVHKlgTztKJ/eWVDZ2yAumQlmCGhfK5k4y7PsA2PkJQAW+uQUh200V3UIUvlsu YtwkrnmwT14MbaBf2Dx/w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:epQ8djVrOkg=:FB20apty9p6hqBs/9wRTce dNmvOEse1t3tb2Wj7RQtAsbfLKLn3EUU3sfCoKY//8hpRjgb7k+sA2rbARpqZKq7YZWFrx0wf dnfEDGmIa6Mlj4NjVURmtkWewF6MofM9gQDmFaTqwRDYPJrVZqKb8lccpxV0cTwaJ7IVI/rM8 PbPO5sgkL1b8WHJSQFjvuY3eFocjwv77wI+Ksp7iYhDYt5I5/2/jdZDJztMXXZYWictC/P18M 5vbwloULd/mvEIQf0PdhVRqr7yJgn6Dwu/r14CuwpyVGHgcaPEEOd0HhjAm7I9UHMEIROpYjr AgtQNfWQrHy3EJTfy21DBILLscUPpkDC5XJCskdBgz4IlJYd5VbfQnSPNk2GZ8AYehlrHZyAt mZv1HscPAZDOrDrXElsVsgiCvN6M9Qo5Uqlyta0RSqtbFKl/j81icNifJCNOT7S9TqZd3eDFx yKlv4KwTO6A7hY0ly4mgUuxeX1t5V5UQeMK5vjv3LVs0fRN64Q85csCzRK66SOVXaggiJOiVH lPkuUbaossjIyPZ7wATHfCPQtDsNGt0dOM4a+yDjfxeASPM/9qWQ2DWFBwVxg2LB72ceCm2x0 vZNzZSlOyWXrcMvlQ4GWLlZvmuVjZOFcPm5gQAFe/tmAuzLtzyePlPWTmaKJboVZSiDMstDk8 YG7VsEBRQqzNTbrpTqKmHKxScoXdQCMe+fX4V1i5KrQFU3ZSp2PKdD6ZjgbFxywAtp89QKzuZ TZxa477kQBT+Zs0jP0qFYs+qHi7laiZ9/vjPISHlsWeXDyozCI4ZUok2HCMN+DHOgVVPTKfO X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208390 Archived-At: Hi, yesterday, I've shown two candidate patches for Tramp (bug#24698, bug#24478). Given, that there will be an Emacs 25.2 soon, I'm undecided whether they shall go into the emacs-25 branch, once confirmed by the bug reporters. Any policy for that? Will there be a test period for Emacs 25.2? One policy could be, that only fixes shall be pushed to the emacs-25 branch for bugs which have been marked as blocking bug#21966. In this case, what would be the policy to add a bug there? bug#24478 belongs to that list already, bug#24698 doesn't. Best regards, Michael.