From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27560: 26.0.50; seq-uniq is slow Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:52:55 +0200 Message-ID: <877ezpr5jc.fsf@petton.fr> References: <8760farkxt.fsf@petton.fr> <87inj964oq.fsf@calancha-pc> <87bmp1r5ng.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499090058 11977 195.159.176.226 (3 Jul 2017 13:54:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 13:54:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 27560@debbugs.gnu.org, ohwoeowho@gmail.com, tino.calancha@gmail.com To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 03 15:54:14 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dS1nj-0002co-Pl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:54:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35324 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS1np-0002Cn-BJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 09:54:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59244) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS1nk-0002Bn-2Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 09:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS1nf-0000Jk-87 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 09:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46874) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS1nf-0000JB-4v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 09:54:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dS1nd-0003KF-R5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 09:54:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Nicolas Petton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:54:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27560.149908998412712 (code B ref 27560); Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:54:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2017 13:53:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49551 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dS1mi-0003Iy-KN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 09:53:04 -0400 Original-Received: from petton.fr ([89.234.186.68]:52108) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dS1mg-0003IM-Ar for 27560@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 09:53:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87bmp1r5ng.fsf@petton.fr> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petton.fr; s=mail; t=1499089976; bh=O7UhVoQFF3jEvnFJewuJK4vdo4D9nut5PocLGybSmg0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=sKl9m5NSYp9aoFbYLTyB4u2ju98YwH+9KGqNc3eyQPouWdc8K5lANckC4IP9xbYKzj3Jy2iQt1lSo1ontpmgSZoSVOIpzPzFxi3xOf8zYiwaV5dTZGrxsUkfit02mUYW6IVysuiXArmOkQXz5QgCwXz7JZQUJFHIH7JjzrlkzhY= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:134119 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Nicolas Petton writes: > Indeed, I will run some benchmarks as well. In your benchmarks, cl-lib > is still much faster than seq-uniq, even if it's not as impressive as > Oleh's benchmark. It looks like I read the benchmark results wrong :) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZWkw3AAoJECM1h6R8IHkQfRMH/21kxTgmsYNeehv9LSs4PrOG uX6C0K8YrNCbfSS3Ux84kiq/udoa8kDis0Mr4UuT3yaFnjAMRUGlcoHR3k4MFZgk SwuXuusdUw9Jfd47P4pFobwnor+Tw5aLQ/4PuIc3r6tWjfyJva6PFGRcmt8b4LFb pg1myCWBCwiM/3OnngkPlBsb0NRR0TJj6NrUDRwWUmpZ/9ZTRySjJEXvXGVkSVzj HUZ7UqIdI91FSD0H6rcH1tvNpuzF40n737gOIG3TZw+dgPbc9NhJ+5M7PNWUg0Al /woQOEtJzQsXXR43X2yXtjFm4ml8x/DvxgaOthyIWvwVxvMT/VdgmjtmIUkaAm4= =Uv4E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--