From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Goaziou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11700: 24.1.50; Bad interaction between BiDi and org-tables Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 22:02:00 +0100 Message-ID: <877eu26wc7.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <83mx46y4f5.fsf@gnu.org> <87mv2y6xx2.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <83374qxlwp.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1512421396 12791 195.159.176.226 (4 Dec 2017 21:03:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 21:03:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: dov.grobgeld@gmail.com, 11700@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 04 22:03:12 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eLxtM-0002uH-GG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 22:03:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45216 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLxtT-0001ee-Ri for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 16:03:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45804) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLxtL-0001dg-MN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 16:03:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLxtH-00067s-0A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 16:03:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37317) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLxtG-00067m-Sv; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 16:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eLxtG-0006yj-Ee; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 16:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Nicolas Goaziou Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 21:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11700 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,org-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11700-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11700.151242132426757 (code B ref 11700); Mon, 04 Dec 2017 21:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11700) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Dec 2017 21:02:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45998 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eLxsK-0006xV-Fw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 16:02:04 -0500 Original-Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:58385) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eLxsI-0006x4-3E for 11700@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 16:02:02 -0500 Original-Received: from saiph.selenimh (000043010000000000000469.ipv6.commingeshautdebit.fr [IPv6:2a03:a0a0:0:4301::469]) (Authenticated sender: mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 250331720A9; Mon, 4 Dec 2017 22:02:01 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from ngz by saiph.selenimh with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eLxsG-0005de-Ib; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 22:02:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83374qxlwp.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 04 Dec 2017 22:45:10 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:140699 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Such tests can only be run interactively, because bidi reordering is a > display-time feature in Emacs. Is that OK with you? That's better than no test at all in my book, so I'm fine with it, yes. I can use isolation characters instead (if anyone cares to point me to what those are), if you think that's better. Regards,