From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28842: gnus-sync is missing Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:57:51 -0500 Organization: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=A2=D0=B5=D0=BE=D0=B4=D0=BE=D1=80_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=97=D0=BB=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <877ett8g7k.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87374jd66s.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bmj6dda0.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <87vahe911g.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87374id7jy.fsf@linux-m68k.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513004359 17518 195.159.176.226 (11 Dec 2017 14:59:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:59:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 28842-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 11 15:59:14 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOPY1-0004EU-EJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:59:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53608 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOPY7-0003m4-4d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:59:19 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40629) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOPXu-0003ki-OP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:59:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOPXr-0002mm-NK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:59:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48272) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOPXr-0002me-Gg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:59:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOPXq-00017x-Cs; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:59:02 -0500 Resent-From: Ted Zlatanov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 28842 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 28842@debbugs.gnu.org, tzz@lifelogs.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org Original-Received: via spool by 28842-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D28842.15130042834251 (code D ref 28842); Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28842-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2017 14:58:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56949 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOPWt-00016U-0w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:58:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qt0-f177.google.com ([209.85.216.177]:39898) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eOPWq-00015w-E0 for 28842-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:58:00 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qt0-f177.google.com with SMTP id k19so39101795qtj.6 for <28842-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 06:58:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifelogs.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:organization:references:mail-copies-to:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=MZDy4Jf1CCG7PBJ7YDH5nxWLSMMmdGStaeDT9g5fS/Y=; b=KpjDAbHUFQCDIipJexwF80XLsm3D9xbH4mgWPn6grBr832GZt8TjWWnly6w8324erw Ctm4u536NKofTua17dh2zg9/qA5Sz838ahHXqLiW4Iber5N0jRMX8POBi/G191RjBLNB PSws/RN0jIY8eXcPmd7tL1V4RU2thie4CybLA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:organization:references :mail-copies-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=MZDy4Jf1CCG7PBJ7YDH5nxWLSMMmdGStaeDT9g5fS/Y=; b=XlM8exWl7A1EmJz9bjvY1I6AltzZ+pfGlhBnA72yi9x71NyQ7PR0KUMkRsibCGmObt cyfiTpBSxXUQhnM01pXRVhFyDpjDmqKeNRdW6mVVYdKO/7/0pl2TAKu46AfpMRSHzOsj MP/1WVwdP4gLWJgEHdqmLg2GQul/oz2epuqaqtYjUT2hQtWCO0s6G6O+WbHFrlUGy3xy YIfhDaIAFyQGf5h40dIYWAOfp30micoUVt0JeLwMpRLCjq9Dt945OIM1wmXqM0kawtfr G1cnVLSeRGbGyOpvnd/fl1sUzOxmoh3gBbTw2KMfq/Ps7eNiPTB11IJNeZrpCbfY20a7 vR2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJ/eLpeMds+BXLCe9oesbW2yidXFwceWUUdXZ51kjbUtGIkp3vN oSf88Xf2z24KLIF3u+oCLpLRrMII6WU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouIxAE/rzYgTldXZu5u8Yuoj/9XWun0N0BDjI/DIKSSSW3JL0dGgkOlh0TBa9cDXyJK9OZVUg== X-Received: by 10.200.49.101 with SMTP id h34mr936672qtb.112.1513004274381; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 06:57:54 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from flea (c-76-28-41-155.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [76.28.41.155]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t48sm4206799qtc.10.2017.12.11.06.57.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 Dec 2017 06:57:53 -0800 (PST) X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: <87374id7jy.fsf@linux-m68k.org> (Andreas Schwab's message of "Sun, 10 Dec 2017 14:41:21 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:140925 Archived-At: On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 14:41:21 +0100 Andreas Schwab wrote: AS> On Dez 10 2017, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> If you disagree, take a look at gnus-sync and see if you can propose a >> way to support it with gnus-cloud. AS> I don't understand. gnus-sync works ootb. I've made the decision to stop supporting gnus-sync in favor of gnus-cloud. The decision is based on number of users, data store consistency, and the implementation details. I'm closing this ticket because it's not a bug that gnus-sync is missing, and I don't think enough Gnus user eyeballs will catch it here if we discuss it as a feature. If you want to bring gnus-sync back, please post in the Gnus mailing list and we can discuss the specifics. Thanks Ted