Sectioning from includes gets confused in export

Sectioning from includes gets confused in export

[Jarmo Hurri]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 501 bytes --]


Greetings.

Attached are two files:
1. steps.org : main org file
2. step.org : file included twice into main org file

If you export the main file to LaTeX (C-c C-e l o) you will notice that
the correct sectioning level of the level 2 section of step.org is lost
in the export. The level 2 section becomes subordinate to level 3
section.

Feature or bug? Possibility of this being fixed?

As usual, this is a simplified version of something much more
complicated I need to do.

All the best,

Jarmo


[-- Attachment #2: main file --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 72 bytes --]


* A process
#+include: step.org
*** something more
#+include: step.org

[-- Attachment #3: included file --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 78 bytes --]

** Step {{{n}}}
*** Short description
   1. a small list
   2. with two items

Re: Sectioning from includes gets confused in export

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Jarmo Hurri <jarmo.hurri@iki.fi> writes:

> Attached are two files:
> 1. steps.org : main org file
> 2. step.org : file included twice into main org file
>
> If you export the main file to LaTeX (C-c C-e l o) you will notice that
> the correct sectioning level of the level 2 section of step.org is lost
> in the export. The level 2 section becomes subordinate to level 3
> section.
>
> Feature or bug? Possibility of this being fixed?

Feature. See (info "(org) Include files"), in particular :minlevel parameter.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

Re: Sectioning from includes gets confused in export

[Jarmo Hurri]

>> If you export the main file to LaTeX (C-c C-e l o) you will notice
>> that the correct sectioning level of the level 2 section of step.org
>> is lost in the export. The level 2 section becomes subordinate to
>> level 3 section.
>>
>> Feature or bug?
>
> Feature. See (info "(org) Include files"), in particular :minlevel
> parameter.

Thanks, that was a super quick response!

All the best,

Jarmo