From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29095: Bug: The '20a09de953f437109a098fa8c4d380663d921481' merge increased my Emacs configuration loading time from 9 s to 60 s Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 22:52:23 -0400 Message-ID: <877eblsaag.fsf@gmail.com> References: <0899d792-c1fe-caa8-183e-298371d226a0@Alexander.Shukaev.name> <87h8ueaioy.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87zi858r9i.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87y3nl7g8l.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <59FEEDA4.4040602@gmx.at> <87d14u5ua1.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <5A02AE92.6010201@gmx.at> <87vaik51ld.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <5A0403AE.6020305@gmx.at> <87po8r4mhp.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <5A049A98.8020901@gmx.at> <87d14r3qfa.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="202316"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: Alexander Shukaev To: 29095@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 23 04:53:16 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hIlYa-000qVf-4T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 04:53:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47132 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hIlYZ-0003pw-5s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 22:53:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hIlYO-0003pk-6T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 22:53:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hIlYM-00068O-PB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 22:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38545) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hIlYM-00067p-Al for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 22:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hIlYM-00027W-47 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 22:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 02:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29095 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 29095-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29095.15559879548112 (code B ref 29095); Tue, 23 Apr 2019 02:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29095) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Apr 2019 02:52:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52089 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hIlXu-00026g-6E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 22:52:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qk1-f178.google.com ([209.85.222.178]:42168) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hIlXr-00026O-Sa; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 22:52:32 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qk1-f178.google.com with SMTP id c190so3927075qke.9; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 19:52:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=DrWQ8BPdJHtxBwhago7Kp9mphA2wWGVDU1NHydFiwhA=; b=S0tQjvRQDURpWGEjCx3RyVQRlqQLFCrJM0IgVFkQnrJXbXkpCQyuYwkZllAvPQ93jv ekwx+Zf8d0mvd8bnSh85YsmGmdy4TA+42ctt338nZAJGshI0KdBydW2V9c3KZVYACwFY rz5DV81YLm4/TrZFReP+Y0qPbrH3dwlWFixiuuINkV6moPEmWw2vsOR18sdNvmTqdfEz Fy4xRnVl9l1ZJHous9tD6c0bLWoEWbB+L/gCAv/XhGtaarYIqH+3iZcWF6d8O3bxJwsZ EpVTUfnyFALehsDeq/tfgLsrVw8hY2+tAtgyHLATPlkqhuzMci2/WQvcIpHUn7Lwr/RS oGKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=DrWQ8BPdJHtxBwhago7Kp9mphA2wWGVDU1NHydFiwhA=; b=i+v+r66UpaeOR1oZzOfoOAimET+snnkAvtZyGOZjxWwE6pK4pekLvJgGuzPoGfQlq1 v7kx2W/QRgkSUSXefhEUexG6eEy3iDV24TfWs/gwS/JyAVlyh5NzGnvHEkYRyT1Rsg+u T4Do3WMIW4tsMa3I4KTsaSJnVgnUeSYVdzi8U7NPDdSEiquyYxJGlZX2WZM4MAhxr1cH u9zO3WmJ8MJ2DrW6Y9YoIsJ+uj2JQ3N0Jd4YQw+Pi65kVnreCKe0esP11Q2eh7Cwz6V2 n9JSmkEt7X0l+BUNfm3jl1t1OrRpzARv/HekPIIxEt9i18+CyEOE0FPUQYikBfU6+amO z5jA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUBwEbvDmXbXsVqObplY0x6qCeBytrvXx2efYmYFtzJrcRdU+JT KDMzy0Gtxumo6Xk+7/uo7htO3PPM X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwDYq13K9nXDBIGYjJHqqDC3vi3ogx4nAN0jKQ6F6Xr1Ne5cE9PNm6BiXyOGI7v+6z64pyzSQ== X-Received: by 2002:a37:7401:: with SMTP id p1mr2178753qkc.172.1555987946117; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 19:52:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from minid (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f47sm9211359qta.80.2019.04.22.19.52.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 22 Apr 2019 19:52:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87d14r3qfa.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> (Noam Postavsky's message of "Thu, 09 Nov 2017 19:53:13 -0500") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:158096 Archived-At: close 29095 quit Noam Postavsky writes: > Do you have the Emacs instance showing up in a different virtual > desktop, or somehow prevent it from becoming visible immediately? It > could be that this window manager somehow prevents Emacs from getting > the expected events to udpate frame visibility correctly. >> Ha, I take this last phrase back. It's actually getting interesting, >> in fact, when `x-wait-for-event-timeout' is nil: >> >> Configuring package recentf...done (0.365s) >> >> but with `x-wait-for-event-timeout' being 0.1: >> >> Configuring package recentf...done (0.131s) >> >> it's back to lower again. Whaaat? > > Is this consistent, or perhaps just a fluke? Seems we're not going to get any more answers. Closing.