From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28182: maybe implement CTRL++ to zoom text Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 05:52:38 +0200 Message-ID: <877e5qa1a1.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87y3qcs3nf.fsf@jidanni.org> <87tva69q12.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87v9uixqew.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83lfu8h6pn.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhinds4o.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="157126"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: stefan@marxist.se, juri@linkov.net, homeros.misasa@gmail.com, 28182@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 30 05:53:12 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEmkI-000eiy-Nl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 05:53:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43458 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iEmkH-00074r-Kl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 23:53:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42262) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iEmkB-00074l-IJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 23:53:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iEmkA-00008M-JG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 23:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47632) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iEmkA-00008I-GF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 23:53:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEmkA-000589-Ci for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 23:53:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 03:53:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28182 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 28182-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28182.156981556819686 (code B ref 28182); Mon, 30 Sep 2019 03:53:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28182) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Sep 2019 03:52:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56453 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEmjv-00057S-Pc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 23:52:47 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:41898) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iEmju-00057H-7a for 28182@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Sep 2019 23:52:46 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iEmjm-0002DX-Fi; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 05:52:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sun, 29 Sep 2019 19:36:06 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:167800 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > > Please tell what is your problem, and why "C-x C-+" doesn't solve it? > > Does C-x C-+ increase the font size? I didn't know that. I thought of > trying C-+ because that is what other graphical applications use. It's a bit unusual, but it was presumably chosen because `C--' was already taken, so the natural pair became `C-x C--' and `C-x C-+'. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no