From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs project mission (was Re: "If you're still seeing problems, please reopen." [ Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:58:04 +0100 Message-ID: <877e3ox1wz.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <20191117113054.49837.qmail@mail.muc.de> <87pnhq7mxg.fsf@gnus.org> <87bltaz9g4.fsf@telefonica.net> <834kz25qp9.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2wexsv1.fsf@telefonica.net> <20191118175639.08d02820@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <874kz0pa9y.fsf@gnus.org> <87sgmjyn60.fsf@gmx.de> <87k17t4e87.fsf@gnus.org> <877e3prkse.fsf@randomsample> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="155148"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 25 00:58:24 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iZ1lo-000eEJ-G9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:58:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39362 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iZ1ln-0006e4-07 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 18:58:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33693) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iZ1lg-0006dw-2F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 18:58:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iZ1le-0002mh-RF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 18:58:15 -0500 Original-Received: from 195-159-176-226.customer.powertech.no ([195.159.176.226]:45590 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iZ1le-0002mR-K9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 18:58:14 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iZ1lb-000e3f-9B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:58:11 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:nwGuHX03jh1/Utd7YcfSvtH1hfk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242694 Archived-At: David Engster writes: >> Yup; I think we have to have this if Gitlab is to be a usable solution >> for Emacs. > > I'm playing around with SourceHut a bit lately > (https://sourcehut.org), The author of SourceHut participates on a forum that I read often. I'm pretty sure that he would welcome a list of requirements from Emacs' maintainers. >> This reminds me of something that I've been meaning to ask -- how come >> there's absolutely no spam on debbugs? Presumably all the 40K debbugs >> addresses are in all the spammers' address books, so the server should >> be flooded by spam, but nothing makes it through. What's the spam >> handling system employed by GNU? > > I dimly remember spam in debbugs being pretty bad ~10 years ago or > so. Something has happened then, but I also don't know what... Possibly the same as with emacs-devel, -help, etc: a sophisticated carbon-based spam filtering system.