From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Kangas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40909: eww: Add max width option similar to Man-width-max Date: Sat, 02 May 2020 22:34:51 +0200 Message-ID: <877dxu3wk4.fsf@stefankangas.se> References: <874kt14nil.fsf@gnus.org> <87ees578mo.fsf@stefankangas.se> <87wo5wzl9i.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="120573"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 40909@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 02 22:35:15 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jUyqu-000VAi-5j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 22:35:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52770 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUyqt-0001oS-8P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 16:35:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59554) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUyql-0001oM-H2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 16:35:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUyqk-0001jw-TL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 16:35:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42468) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUyqk-0001ik-E0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 16:35:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUyqk-0003jd-2y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 16:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Kangas Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 May 2020 20:35:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40909 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40909-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B40909.158845170114348 (code B ref 40909); Sat, 02 May 2020 20:35:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40909) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 May 2020 20:35:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54014 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUyqi-0003jL-N5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 16:35:01 -0400 Original-Received: from ted.gofardesign.uk ([67.225.143.91]:34078) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jUyqh-0003j8-Ar for 40909@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 16:34:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=marxist.se; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=KavAYTxuTdZQki4nXk2i928vUeppHH3lKoKIiLEWugc=; b=KjsmZfDdjrsopYLSxuDXHoKsEX s2gg2CRjvBF1xIqKRn+kUHzRet0lQZXXkUs/DG9wIt8Qg2JeUpJrEsxSwsGwZIYmi4DIwcvdqcLCZ LEZuP7PWNlWahYVUDOHU2wClKIGAaR/TVLdV1eTimKm+EkxfIuJwcvSnvELfWpV5ZKSy6DXrE84lZ 1u/s0smDXADBeIK3E7Dcsg8HEWh5iLCuYnSHNxuyZjjPoJDBuu8XdSpZlR+oakms8Je7zJ5B20Ypn f3xhmRybzVw/Ha2e3IcXqaFB3bB5XF020cMKppFA8Vmsema2As/5cgHI7yTNQcwdAVAXIsJxTSUkt 7TSkcIfQ==; Original-Received: from h-4-70-69.a785.priv.bahnhof.se ([155.4.70.69]:54624 helo=localhost) by ted.gofardesign.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jUyqb-000PkM-7F; Sat, 02 May 2020 16:34:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wo5wzl9i.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 01 May 2020 00:00:57 +0200") X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - ted.gofardesign.uk X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - debbugs.gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - marxist.se X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: ted.gofardesign.uk: authenticated_id: stefan@marxist.se X-Authenticated-Sender: ted.gofardesign.uk: stefan@marxist.se X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:179543 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: >>> I'm sorry, I don't quite understand what you mean. Why would reading >>> anything be more difficult on HiDPI monitors? >> >> Sorry, I mean on a large monitor with e.g. 16:9 aspect ratio. > > Oh, with the frames full-width? It didn't even occur to me that anybody > would do something like that. :-) Yes, that's my normal use-case. I'd rather deal with Emacs than any window manager. > Is that a thing people do? I mean... why? That'll leave a lot of > unused screen real estate for most things Emacs displays. When I start Emacs it's just one full screen frame and one window. But I generally use 2-3 windows vertically when working. FWIW, I asked on the #emacs IRC channel and at least some people reported they usually do something similar. > But, yes, rendering web pages very wide is usually not good for > readability, but... if a person has decided to have full-width frames, > doesn't that also mean that that person likes to have really long lines? Not in my use, at least, it doesn't mean that. I configure everything to be 80 columns wide, if at all possible. Long lines are very annoying, arguably probably even more so in my use-case than in others. Best regards, Stefan Kangas