From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: thunk.el: Document that thunk-force == funcall? Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:49:08 +0100 Message-ID: <877dqh8ynf.fsf@petton.fr> References: <871rgs3tdx.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1704"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Stefan Monnier To: Drew Adams , Michael Heerdegen , Emacs Development Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 19 10:49:55 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kfgZe-0000LL-G7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 10:49:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56230 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfgZd-0001O1-Fc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 04:49:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40398) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfgZ5-0000xm-1J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 04:49:19 -0500 Original-Received: from petton.fr ([89.234.186.68]:37194) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfgZ3-0000ID-6x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 04:49:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=petton.fr; s=email; t=1605779350; bh=bY3PsRmVhxklhjZd0aXw4VtI6hziECwI8vvMU1Z5EAo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ln5lRKXNn8hadCzWd1MtOL9J3bzQN+gsNf6lWP9fM36wzqagzn17McDRJmc24XF0m NO0Oc8rK5nj4Mnhmzb3AyJuSM1T53nyiGf3PKxz6YsLI4QXI4x0PipiU+1Hsns8OLS cgeFXIJF7cw64aRP7nCn8o+TUZTmLjm6Yj0Kf+2U= In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=89.234.186.68; envelope-from=nico@petton.fr; helo=petton.fr X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/19 04:49:11 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:259418 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Drew Adams writes: >> I have encountered this requirement several times (and using `thunk- >> let' was not always the solution) - thus my question. > FWIW, that makes sense to me. Why not tell users this? > It's fine to have an abstraction, but in Lisp it can > help to know the implementation, especially in a > straightforward case like this. Indeed, I agree. Cheers, Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFDBAEBCAAtFiEE1AWqLIYsVPF+7mvg6LzXhmr8+XgFAl+2P5QPHG5pY29AcGV0 dG9uLmZyAAoJEOi814Zq/Pl4sCYIANI9WHZifdEedVy4cy0KbN6AnLAWkOG1yfXq KK00RJ2rtg/hFPIfEqWEoCwVqhfEAQM6g7i+MLJBrOvUpvTwUuddAIg8Kp0W+5mu z5n1FEaNItS89N/HgMFa7jDtm4BltsYEvoz2GTq7Qil/O+cZ9D+fHjmszk8oOJ3c CleGtqlAo4cD/lAhbvJuxmQ2qCdguf3mHXp5f9R4XjR2Ii/Yh8c3Pb2Fn2iQUcXG R0rjy9r54X2/SYLtNgF9kFf7ZrGQHNt0qIeD3jL4mBqXWV7SepkaEZHDnB094pXj jGBpddbIB9kIh15ezBKWTH/SA8oMCpPdhTOi2X+gitTS2dP73PY= =n6fD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--