From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54289: 29.0.50; Emacs ignores xmodmap Super_L assignment Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 13:03:44 +0100 Message-ID: <877d94tzvj.fsf@gmx.net> References: <87pmmyt2oj.fsf@rub.de> <87v8wpl1ok.fsf@yahoo.com> <87pmmxl1k0.fsf@yahoo.com> <87o82gu8ps.fsf@gmx.net> <87fsnslpp6.fsf@yahoo.com> <87k0d4u4lw.fsf@gmx.net> <878rtklov8.fsf@yahoo.com> <87fsnsu35u.fsf@gmx.net> <87wnh4k88p.fsf@yahoo.com> <87bkygu0yf.fsf@gmx.net> <87r17ck6g4.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4859"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 54289@debbugs.gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 08 13:06:46 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nRYc0-00014C-IJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 13:06:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36006 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nRYbz-0000eE-AN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 07:06:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nRYZh-0007rq-9Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 07:04:22 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33281) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nRYZO-0002G4-JQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 07:04:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nRYZO-00040o-C2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 07:04:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stephen Berman Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 12:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54289 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 54289-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54289.164674103615408 (code B ref 54289); Tue, 08 Mar 2022 12:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54289) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Mar 2022 12:03:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55411 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nRYZH-00040S-SJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 07:03:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:54933) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nRYZF-00040E-IJ for 54289@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 07:03:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1646741025; bh=UAGqB5mWNtxrTYlUWc0gbq3mho3syhjBPSwX5+TVCEk=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Tr//fHAtuPmFH+qM9wjg3DVB2MDRxyOucCYDER9qZADdL4mSHug0193Hda521FBlL IeZg5oedgAyWijg2b8/oNVmeIiZ6lIthafuakUHBhS0m6Zj11C6gdpBDrY5GmiEgV0 +/+ekFtEhqdTP+ZG/fVZg81TWAQ6FjFv7truvbIg= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from strobelfs2 ([89.246.36.100]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MeCtZ-1nyxi22gnH-00bNwy; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 13:03:45 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87r17ck6g4.fsf@yahoo.com> (Po Lu's message of "Tue, 08 Mar 2022 19:51:55 +0800") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:8Nzq98mmjuUgqefeqCwu3iRXWTRzbYlFdU67xv+nj+gVHr0blOz oxlX8hRs7MLhzB0k4BsewB+k3R0HwZetXzKVMgeM148SdHdcWfjrTFTL244kK09QJfSdC6f NC8xM1irMgxxCJaqnIAVQeZJqsTISlLudIvHolGl5ojANfSaCrfAR84xxs4RXJHlsbbJrp/ yTLlsoB8eNRnKVAOZ5KBQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:E/dD/+M9hKk=:F/TA8avNzk6XIe5Ul05dHl 8EGUvUA6HY14OF6j1sijV5lQNNiRTQ0ygpShxl3+jvuHy+m+9rgvYcEnrPSngOI25+rAvrR6f AJ9tXbde8Oxtd+4fnjqjz6aseurqOGa4n9OC0ARwCGi2gpSfgTp4jJQ6FQE9lHx6IfII32oSY r6xdXLBUGrMMtMnQviEsuyG0aFzEjlgiOqw7BFvVIuIJ3TWfPX1XMskzcenoYxYMGeLnJNcNz PCYfMphiNf8zEIJe+wt0EU9WMz6xutpi35WWjbmGpLBkGQ3zbCWUcKS/uAUhl2HLYhE6Thgtz kQzMysAd+phzouXneg9JiFmWlvwVl8AW/iBwtUGhdS32aXlR2zUeYBNsNnSAWmGrEfH/WuYjI d9tNSZFoZjlK0lnCWTrLek4e3+dAqjazzhXC7owIftryAb+rKPOnK5bFt05q3+8jYQI+sNkM8 FKksZY1fT2L9Qk20HTHR93Ui5o6wTxthvVbhKKdrZ3+OLQqDcNL2/B/o0rwjnOTUJ3V6lQGow LJdyQJo1Ciu6qCbop0ubZZvypeVnFQqKiV2xDExSDXvawvaFV5iXeCzp1GBQVYn4IUMHC+kKo dIZGtv4xxXHosfX2l5HZFMywQrK/itbDPcOxBPnfXB9Hfk4ht8xAsHodqeTlvXAe6wwD5IqXa wun8J90xeA4Vh8Jbh2W05XKhWoGZq4PFI9HPBn8+JyAvFEPm9vde6gPRwnHB2ZXrImKaYAgoV fUnCjcY63MluL6Ecqu7o4gsmObeHM/a/bWQeJQOjmz7uDwuY94CWJ3f0/dGVvu9AYd5n82A0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:228140 Archived-At: On Tue, 08 Mar 2022 19:51:55 +0800 Po Lu wrote: > Stephen Berman writes: > >> Thread 1 "emacs" hit Breakpoint 3, handle_one_xevent >> (dpyinfo=3Ddpyinfo@entry=3D0xd586e0, event=3Devent@entry=3D0x7fffffffd4= 10, >> finish=3Dfinish@entry=3D0xaac980 , >> hold_quit=3D0x7fffffffd660) at >> /home/steve/src/emacs/emacs-master/src/xterm.c:12549 >> warning: Source file is more recent than executable. >> 12549 if (rec->map->modmap && rec->map->modmap[xev->detail]) >> $1 =3D 64 '@' >> [Thread 0x7fffe8f9a640 (LWP 10839) exited] >> >> The GDB session is still running; do you want any further output? >> >> Steve Berman > > That indicates the super key is still Mod4. Can you show the output of > running `xmodmap' after evaluating the lines I sent earlier? xmodmap: up to 4 keys per modifier, (keycodes in parentheses): shift Shift_L (0x32), Shift_R (0x3e) lock control Control_L (0x25), Control_L (0x42), Control_R (0x69) mod1 Alt_L (0x40), Meta_L (0xcd) mod2 Num_Lock (0x4d) mod3 mod4 slash (0x85), Super_R (0x86), slash (0xce), Hyper_L (0xcf) mod5 ISO_Level3_Shift (0x5c), Mode_switch (0xcb) I ran `xmodmap .Xmodmap' with those lines added and then ran just xmodmap, getting the above ouput. This is identical to the output of xmodmap I sent previously, without the added lines from you. Do the added lines need to be in a particular order with respect to the existing lines? Currently my .Xmodmap has these uncommented lines, in the order listed: remove Lock =3D Caps_Lock keysym Caps_Lock =3D Control_L add Control =3D Control_L remove mod4 =3D Super_R remove mod4 =3D Hyper_L remove mod4 =3D slash keysym Super_L =3D slash keysym Menu =3D backslash Steve Berman