From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27229: eldoc wrong highlighting for "when" Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 09:46:32 +0200 Message-ID: <877d71wxif.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87k0w6dg58.fsf@web.de> <87o89a12nc.fsf@gnus.org> <86lf4dwxk8.fsf@gmail.com> <874kb1wwru.fsf@gnus.org> <86y28dd1r9.fsf@gmail.com> <87zgssu9sl.fsf@gnus.org> <86wnnwlbjm.fsf@gmail.com> <875yvgqwsy.fsf@gnus.org> <87y1zk1b1b.fsf@gnus.org> <835ymn6hum.fsf@gnu.org> <87fslr0ywx.fsf@gnus.org> <83r15a514r.fsf@gnu.org> <87tua6yirx.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmku50ao.fsf@gnu.org> <87fslqyi3k.fsf@gnus.org> <83o80e4zu6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30671"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, 27229@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 04 09:51:40 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nm9nP-0007lc-T5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 09:51:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38208 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nm9nO-00024w-LB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 03:51:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53656) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nm9iw-0007mJ-RC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 03:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:47744) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nm9iw-0000X4-I7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 03:47:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nm9iw-0000nP-GS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 03:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 May 2022 07:47:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27229 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 27229-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27229.16516504053034 (code B ref 27229); Wed, 04 May 2022 07:47:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27229) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 May 2022 07:46:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41641 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nm9if-0000ms-3W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 03:46:45 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:36216) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nm9id-0000mc-E8 for 27229@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2022 03:46:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rt21wXhOiBdgnLbgCGu3TWopliUkdb1Gr6EClSlVn2Y=; b=LfaHqsBv4LVLH2v9ISrNqIIJCj eH5gI0yR3TEalMJOJ5s49eLRALzHs16SN8uIUYAq9ov3f57YQS3+h75+ProyUTV8kbvrpq0TmKMwW sSSyvKhImleZrImzzstntrzx8qjf1I6WcdTsTwJB4lNhAkV9aQG7OQPAuwRA41pCSyVs=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nm9iU-0008LB-6l; Wed, 04 May 2022 09:46:36 +0200 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAElBMVEVpQUqNbGehgnmr j4ykPFb////1tcpiAAAAAWJLR0QF+G/pxwAAAAd0SU1FB+YFBAcqAs9h8ZkAAAG7SURBVDjLbZOL ecMwCIRR3QEALRChBWqpA3T/qXqAZLsPJfmS6AcdcDIVMR0qWNbnnPgMfM1BImpTzcbwvT7Ooh4w AUSbrNX6/KBjZbBIYbzxEul9gdMzpID6NnTmC6BDhoo81xwAY5j0J1CIGdNh0Bz0jFdEAgwzMSp3 TYirlekN5Zr91FDFUepdyi/QAQT7dT41mjRtjMMtRxL17xRhP6P1884gX4Vpr62RO4XeP/8Fwsf8 BST/MH09AKKvgl38zrhARbmKdhoahBkO/AWwq3Yg7pUQpyPeuSmmGxqPubxI+2kiS9xtDIrpljrQ u5ee8WVnvCmcGlkPRRqnxqFznKjHEzwNzbg+jKowquUc4k1xlXzsZwBXxikZ7gBN9BBfwIsoPhLV NYwYTl65EhmzntH5AviB+2I+UAD13Q2Yo9x3H9XapYJxHlwWwLVwgLO8TZLXNR65AIJJWgmjbsCF 1r0ygVHpCfljsw30JycaXBm3szH2uH2a4GEUMmpbR+l2sIV4lXOBq8TMqG3kUZRGXfequsgfYFdV YTm5r9nO3aADTlOdAPgDEpWGc1sjnUvA9+VJwNn5I/4xxG+tY0pqahonDQAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpj cmVhdGUAMjAyMi0wNS0wNFQwNzo0MjowMiswMDowMJa32oEAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIw MjItMDUtMDRUMDc6NDI6MDIrMDA6MDDn6mI9AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Simple Minds's _New Gold Dream (81-82-83-84)_: "Someone Somewhere In Summertime" In-Reply-To: <83o80e4zu6.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 03 May 2022 14:31:29 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:231370 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I'm not worried too much about these two, I'm more worried about the > ability to use the advertised-signature feature in general. There is no general case here -- the advertised convention in these two cases were with all the other macros that have this signature, and removed information to boot. >> Like I said, if we want to change how we present &rest body to the >> users, then we should do so for all of these macros, and not just two. > > What about if I want to change that only for a specific case, not in > general? Is this now "verboten"? Not if the advertised convention is an improvement. It wasn't here. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no