From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taiju HIGASHI Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add an option to not reduce vocabulary of the Japanese Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 21:41:08 +0900 Message-ID: <877d5s63yz.fsf@taiju.info> References: <87r142ypnq.fsf@gnu.org> <878rqa9cm8.fsf@taiju.info> <87k09tubfa.fsf@gnus.org> <837d5t98qq.fsf@gnu.org> <87h74x96em.fsf@taiju.info> <834k0x93ra.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8td710c.fsf@taiju.info> <83v8tc7nrm.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1632"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, handa@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 07 15:09:56 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nyYy3-0000Cj-9u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 15:09:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52858 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nyYy2-0002g3-7J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 09:09:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nyYWM-0000xq-09 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 08:41:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]:38525) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nyYWI-0004A3-Fc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 08:41:17 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id v11-20020a17090a4ecb00b001e2c5b837ccso20701819pjl.3 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 05:41:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=taiju-info.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=mekzIIyHOguGsEihRUlT04Ih9jk0t9TmY89YAWR3hsg=; b=22c0lSJ4c3xciVsWvpA45oI5cKHcJ+KuAA2PSjpLtpgDB3X/hdaTgAFESuGu4Vr/CE DW/zi2XfrrZgRWc3oGfGavUy6/k29xDNgjItqnsAjVl+agxDUAckkmcTt9L9WTR8Cgdt r+8Bbo/WSADzQzX0kVyIfnS4iUxhk/luV5Wwy0CcrfH5E7tOiO88nvwDZfSx/3ZGTbW9 KyKhMcXWPV32ncQk1e4MNXrwUJV26w5NLX1Ag48Q01AXktBMQa67nPA7vjMto43q+hco orpmN5eV5A2jHVo669Zbupnyoh7St6sEjiHpIUiB060lpdxpysqIXWnlbYOFMJ9QI7o2 p2Tg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=mekzIIyHOguGsEihRUlT04Ih9jk0t9TmY89YAWR3hsg=; b=1s1nw1He8VUl4X0jaqqd9RlNT2wFqceKrvYGq5zSeQp1K53O5Xricg5aSQ+1d3jBj0 k58uqw7JKq6mWtFkN2SykkM9CiUL64ZdYbRPabm1/SyIG5UjiBZQNtrgullU1hHWhqWV SPcfldmOHwJNmAk2zDhVYYdU7ZIWIgrcjaCxS0JqSvhYoSDQuxwsex41Lrpg+QoUOWFV 7M1i6yhXBha9X75QFa0s81VH+2PBV2e7HKZFoJRSxU34Mg1pz5cO802BMnx27vs3ugJr 0/nFNWAfmuAyPAepqtpNb9A3jMBlo8xtVBcpLIHsXQ0jPpcMCzmLlbsIy/kFgWd16smQ UHKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5330svixzRx8zWSTOkkkzD4lGD+a7CRru7BMd/KUU7d9CWAw+9pU THik05nHwyQuZjEz50WgbemUp2LSNzIG69G/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzj5cOxkaeLkn8IrzXQbesdmks9CPXJRJ5291offPutVbovhIobHtBqeKfHJDS1/2RLT2eQdQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c2d8:b0:15e:fa17:56cc with SMTP id c24-20020a170902c2d800b0015efa1756ccmr29187084pla.40.1654605672874; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 05:41:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Taix ([240b:253:ec40:2400:b7d1:436e:2d61:e925]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gb12-20020a17090b060c00b001e31fea8c85sm14557485pjb.14.2022.06.07.05.41.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 07 Jun 2022 05:41:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83v8tc7nrm.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 07 Jun 2022 13:48:13 +0300") Received-SPF: none client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f; envelope-from=higashi@taiju.info; helo=mail-pj1-x102f.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290859 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Taiju HIGASHI >> Cc: larsi@gnus.org, handa@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 09:47:31 +0900 >> >> I thought that if reducing vocabulary is an option, some people might >> question what reducing vocabulary means. So, to make it easier to convey >> the intent, I changed the configure option to with-small-ja-dic and also >> changed the description. > > Thanks, but I thought we all agreed that by default the build should > NOT reduce the vocabulary, so that use of the option would be needed > only if someone would want the current behavior back? And this v3 > does it the other way around? Or did I miss something? The default behavior of the build process of the v3 patch does not reduce the vocabulary, but It reduces the vocabulary when the --with-small-ja-dic option is specified. However, as you pointed out in another email, I have made the inappropriate correction in the ja-dic-cnv.el, So I fix it. -- Taiju