From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57152: 29.0.50; Emacs executable isn't rebuilt when loaddefs.el is modified Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 12:40:32 +0200 Message-ID: <877d37kva7.fsf@gnus.org> References: <83k07endtb.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgg9o5nx.fsf@gnus.org> <8335e1o4yg.fsf@gnu.org> <878rnsl683.fsf@gnus.org> <87a685akh8.fsf@gnus.org> <838rnpiur4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8394"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 57152@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 17 12:41:11 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oOGU3-00020O-46 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 12:41:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48400 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOGU1-000246-SQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 06:41:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53058) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOGTu-00023e-PN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 06:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:59752) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOGTu-0004CW-G8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 06:41:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oOGTu-0007md-Ca for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 06:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 10:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57152 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 57152-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57152.166073284629891 (code B ref 57152); Wed, 17 Aug 2022 10:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57152) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Aug 2022 10:40:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49501 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oOGTe-0007m3-35 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 06:40:46 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:44098) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oOGTc-0007lp-2K for 57152@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 06:40:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Wu7Cri7LFifmvsNZVV/jYy+/0PrZO5jw1Pd63ehssug=; b=DFIRsHFIFKgveaQvIo1UTeBkLS FQsnxffowt3iMvS+277bRk4/SHfD82OSeqVuLw8aq94wXitHTnSafK8w/biDMQWsE4umq11H6g85y F8v4INPnBMy4BGafMwzglxbuYqUF1tuVu7vhvb4IMIvc+kRtTedYT9tGCmdkmwFvKwsg=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=joga) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oOGTT-000826-7E; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 12:40:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: ("Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?="'s message of "Mon, 15 Aug 2022 15:32:43 +0200") Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAJFBMVEX3vR78xBz8xiPw vCPOoybDojcoU6F+g3CckVpWa4RjcXr///9rP2zAAAAAAWJLR0QLH9fEwAAAAAd0SU1FB+YIEQof H5nZr7kAAAGKSURBVDjLbZM9TgNBDIVnkgtgL0ghnU2TNlmgD1oOgOAKEVyDgoiUKZBouSn2en48 A5Miib/187PHGyLMh+wLUH8iMwcLYwYaJi5A/gjUEPAcFoCYckRFgiksIDLa8yxPuxM0XaUEENcE Dgt5Um2glGVAdFJMxLfTNO0nPY+7AkDAMC7H3RjHm3GZMyQBiFUhlamAwcL6wQaQZc1p4FyJGwVI qoPerojLqGpWBVZB+nHNJwAwPMus+KWCOFcHuHyV4awOTec29eMTwf17nyFjWb3x3Rc2QO9SbG0+ PomclIxK7wjp9LCpSuIKrAe+OiB+O6mt+kdpY3VmOv2pIbbWAo7MvV2C6zPAcedqaHe6KTPY+gyw BerBAtMKGsA83xChAWXAFawNIHlAFZTdpRbU3Q1F6sdcgQeagSI6aKs8L5HUkG3nnGYr1rrKINkS KX1hCkh76WvkDF+c3Fub9zeEiE0NMgPcxYsz72pr1YurmIpf7Ns+QqfDabX6BuuLk5Wayq6Pf0A/ rHQjv8c1hIV9NDCUAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOmNyZWF0ZQAyMDIyLTA4LTE3VDEwOjMxOjMxKzAwOjAw kuVh3wAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTptb2RpZnkAMjAyMi0wOC0xN1QxMDozMTozMSswMDowMOO42WMAAAAA SUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: King Crimson's _Three of a Perfect Pair_: "Nuages (That Which Passes, Passes Like Clouds)" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:240037 Archived-At: Gerd M=C3=B6llmann writes: > Could it be that src/Makefile is simply not invoked after lisp/Makefile > has built loaddefs.*? In Makefile.in we have > > SUBDIR =3D $(NTDIR) lib lib-src src lisp > ... > all: ${SUBDIR} info $(gsettings_SCHEMAS:.xml=3D.valid) > > That is src comes before lisp. Haching something like a second 'make > -C' at the end seems to do something not entirely unreasonable. Hm, interesting... but I think we might end up in a situation where we first build the Emacs executable, then update the loaddefs.el, and then build the Emacs executable again. But perhaps that's OK -- while we're scanning for new loaddefs every build, there's seldom any new ;;;###autoloads, so the loaddefs.el file doesn't update all that often. I'm not quite sure where the second "make -C" would go, though.