From: Joost Kremers <joostkremers@fastmail.fm>
To: Christopher Dimech <dimech@gmx.com>
Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Org-Mode compared to Jupyter
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 12:36:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877d0bszsr.fsf@fastmail.fm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <trinity-50592bc2-7a89-4def-afb9-f25a84318d6d-1667549662642@3c-app-mailcom-bs05>
On Fri, Nov 04 2022, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> I wonder how Org-Mode compares to Jupyter (an interactive scientific computing framework).
That really depends on what you find important. Org mode can do a lot more than
"just" create interactive notebooks, so you can, for example, add a TODO item
directly in your notebook and have it appear in the list of TODOs in the agenda.
Org mode also has a lot more language backends and you can combine them in a
single notebook. I've occasionally used Elisp, bash and Python together in one
notebook, because some things that are one-liners in bash require more work in
Python, and I know Elisp better than both bash and Python, so some things come
easier to me in it.
You can even connect to Jupyter kernels from Org mode:
https://github.com/nnicandro/emacs-jupyter
So I'd say Org is a lot more powerful, but Jupyter is accessed from a browser
and is therefore more accessible. You don't need to familiarise yourself with
some weird text editor to use it.
But if you're already familiar with said text editor, then the only reason to
use Jupyter that I can think of would be the need to collaborate with others.
Just my €0.02, of course.
--
Joost Kremers
Life has its moments
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-04 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-04 8:14 Org-Mode compared to Jupyter Christopher Dimech
2022-11-04 11:16 ` Eric S Fraga
2022-11-04 11:36 ` Joost Kremers [this message]
2022-11-04 11:56 ` tomas
2022-11-04 14:01 ` Robert Pluim
2022-11-04 14:16 ` Joost Kremers
2022-11-04 14:32 ` Robert Pluim
2022-11-04 14:27 ` Thibaut Verron
2022-11-04 16:31 ` tomas
2022-11-04 17:24 ` Thibaut Verron
2022-11-05 13:56 ` Jean Louis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877d0bszsr.fsf@fastmail.fm \
--to=joostkremers@fastmail.fm \
--cc=dimech@gmx.com \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.