From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [NonGNU ELPA] 11 new packages! Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 12:17:22 +0000 Message-ID: <877czr3zql.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87r0y6ug9z.fsf@disroot.org> <87y1sct2hp.fsf@posteo.net> <87k03vf5m8.fsf@disroot.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23904"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Akib Azmain Turja , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 19 13:17:38 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1owMmv-0005zW-BP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 13:17:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owMmk-0002Q0-UB; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 07:17:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owMmj-0002Pd-DL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 07:17:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1owMmh-00047T-MZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 07:17:25 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18717240104 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 13:17:22 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1668860242; bh=Z1kqVCjeRd5wDFZ7PPRgezp2B4ortORzeTzAYIc4XWw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=BNIHFfcarnR033OS50aQoQ3HImNsFnz5tHw3EoBulFBW2olsTW5fdDZAewHIE2nyf B6s25yieq1qQjdgKG2fq0ckWcEX21f8kuoBjl3k1FD6zydR8bjQsLcpH8A+50urqK2 AZ/5GRj6KHP5b83WUGMG8h3h5mT8r2FKzez8OwAKeftRLXCg2V19LRH2S+TtfxAJHI VIf7ahHpRVSlf7Kyaa7WgXEDn56IKpbba6+tdD4ZLSp9F/xZpqmVrd64RwASgCKgam PLzM8KgQFD9715de1RlGZdsqDKAlJmAt87Kv523m2vVVKSgIahGOPuSRoeSqnSYten PVQq1YBIJcczw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NDt294fJKz9rxM; Sat, 19 Nov 2022 13:17:21 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sat, 19 Nov 2022 07:05:05 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:300171 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > > >> Before someone asks me to consider assigning my copyright, I would like > > >> to say that a printed copy of assignment agreement is in my hands right > > >> now, but I can't sign it now, and I don't know when I'll able to sign > > >> (don't get me wrong, I really want to sign it). > > > > > > Do you know when you will know, or are you saying that it isn't worth > > > waiting? > > > No, I don't know. It might be tomorrow (very unlike, but possible), or > > even months later. I think these packages should be published in the > > mean time. > > Not in GNU ELPA! An agreement that MIGHT be signed is not valid. The initial proposal was to add the packages to NonGNU ELPA, I just mentioned GNU ELPA to double-check. > It is ok to add them to NonGNU ELPA if they meet the other > requirements for NonGNU ELPA. >From what I saw, the requirements are all given. But I'll try to find some time tomorrow to check the packages individually.