From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Brian Leung Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59921: 30.0.50; emacs HEAD is missing some older emacs-29 commits Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 21:08:40 +0000 Message-ID: <877cz0qo5j.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87r0x8rie6.fsf@posteo.net> <87bkocrbfe.fsf@posteo.net> <83h6y4zi5r.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27232"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com, 59921@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 09 22:11:29 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p3keX-0006rm-T0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 22:11:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3ke8-0003GL-0s; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 16:11:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3ke6-0003G9-06 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 16:11:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p3ke5-0001p0-Nr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 16:11:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p3ke5-0005ii-Iw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 16:11:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Brian Leung Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 21:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59921 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59921-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59921.167062022821972 (code B ref 59921); Fri, 09 Dec 2022 21:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59921) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Dec 2022 21:10:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38533 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p3kdY-0005iK-Cq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 16:10:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:40003) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p3kdW-0005iA-EF for 59921@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2022 16:10:26 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96E8C240104 for <59921@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 22:10:20 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1670620220; bh=F9fjlai29yan48cs/bJSnv5wQizygVrdGJKEXidB2Uc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=CaTPqrWUXX6Ln4J7+VIya+cFK2RCsNDyoaNogx3boj82Qm6CqORVc60C0bmlf23+N md01aodoZ45Wy0ulPDrkfvFWb0BK5oVkLyecmDIwfC8S1QOaENiGcg39AYbeiyaodp K9uuvk1jwYaPx97zYaA8vTdm6GbvCdAzUBHNz3DQ/F/DUPsZKrqgi9Sbnm6wuo7BEZ 27a3az61393DQwijkEfNh/AsaFTMXse3hlFApuE7iuXYrbxSzeGZFMo6MuNzBmQink KXnUDMs6IZEnJFS9RtS7pL7e9JCLWMjIfRn1MMFgv/WdOM2L0DqUOyxU+nuPwax2+g ap8pg54bniL9g== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4NTNvv1hzbz9rxD; Fri, 9 Dec 2022 22:10:18 +0100 (CET) In-reply-to: <83h6y4zi5r.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:250463 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> I arrived at a similar conclusion using Magit. I don't have a >> great understanding of Git, so my best guess is that >> 64c7b57ae72 >> somehow skipped over more commits than expected. You can verify >> that the changes corresponding to the missing commits are >> present >> in the emacs-29 branch but not in master. > > How did you detect the missing changes in the first place? I was working in one of the files and noticed that a change I knew had been made to that file wasn't there.