From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 10:34:08 +0100 Message-ID: <877cuhla0f.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <87wn2modrm.fsf@posteo.net> <87ile6o2ov.fsf@posteo.net> <87y1mz38rl.fsf@posteo.net> <87ile2n0kn.fsf@gmail.com> <301ec075-c5f6-092c-b789-175c8cc64e1e@gutov.dev> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40442"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, Philip Kaludercic , eliz@gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen , Stefan Monnier To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 12 11:33:15 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pmWqo-000AFo-M5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:33:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmWqe-0001Yw-Ev; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 05:33:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmWqd-0001Yg-5X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 05:33:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pmWqc-0007T2-Ts for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 05:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmWqc-0007zv-Fz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 05:33:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.168129193330672 (code B ref 62720); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 09:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2023 09:32:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39066 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmWpo-0007yd-Kw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 05:32:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com ([209.85.128.46]:56140) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pmWpm-0007yN-9v for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 05:32:10 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id m8so19819058wmq.5 for <62720@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 02:32:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1681291924; x=1683883924; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=5YoW49cDse5cLl3HvnoqlUpprrkM9F3wpTWI6NkgdSs=; b=WmegloABggw6YxpdMZuinlI2YSl2N/oIdzJJsiH2UCmmV6k5j1xxvBbF5AmGpysHKi PZfANHGX0QHcSzDy6xi4a3Vi7ponmX0Ry9SWi52xFVfJ3E/MgzHHkVdEatnfZqvaDFA+ 4bFPL69udbo/AZD9/UK6+FH5hvjZARYv+Uum/b2UhfnDhqpYQ6PIPsL1u4wAmZJaeSAL DO8lPWA7uOi7XetMSfXiHJfkIIC/hvjHkrpf2kAL5EA8EN4TO/FWYAjwpJCNrsbtv6h1 EE+Mi0z3c3eAyVmget1aE8/q07LFlrGa8mxBBx6drM4ONeAGJhprKIoWrR1tul68MA7i ot/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681291924; x=1683883924; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=5YoW49cDse5cLl3HvnoqlUpprrkM9F3wpTWI6NkgdSs=; b=2IyWiYKSzxqPYivepm9wyMMVAD5vYvyV2zrnvBxXLcteLWYVR74A0siRZPKGdJkE6W 9GObMicdHFjdH8o27xawly8SMfAQtjRnPm2lOafcACulXCBUO0Wg5+BuBlQXdmhu+xg7 i2vW9xDbDsaKaCE0JCDOvnY1FM4NT3fjtenbEdo48DsjCAKmIz+9x4shGQ+R/GTCQ2oB nc99d/Wo3ARz8qMHOhhfxqkaulV0bfri3JQczzGpsI4Bov0LWAr8KVGUql9jnChHjBnq 8198NHNn0jiU3E1UaFv7j+MLPttb1HcOtezX33Qhp+7NpBs9v40sWYaVsJfXon14L03o YxtQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9dSt+DaTSRMozpkJ6qaIJnSvHCWgKrBBDTa0yJHUC1CKC0ExbE5 TLKzIz+ruUEvdbkyY7WPQsI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350ZLEwCKdsiGjHnXQwU9oZpeq6d6BKjNDS5jkMbT0Z8PK8tiEtJG+TGz7lv+7tmSXkG0k1lOuw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2148:b0:3ed:f9d3:f95c with SMTP id v8-20020a05600c214800b003edf9d3f95cmr9503051wml.19.1681291924401; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 02:32:04 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from krug ([87.196.73.56]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 9-20020a05600c228900b003ed2276cd0dsm1693295wmf.38.2023.04.12.02.32.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 12 Apr 2023 02:32:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <301ec075-c5f6-092c-b789-175c8cc64e1e@gutov.dev> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Wed, 12 Apr 2023 00:14:06 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:259716 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 11/04/2023 14:02, Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora wrote: >> Philip Kaludercic writes: >>=20 >>> Will this not affect `package-update-all'? I don't if we want that the >>> command installs all packages from ELPA that it can find. >> Thanks. I've just tested 'M-x package-update-all' with my patch. It >> updates the built-in and the manually installed packages that can be >> updated. It_doesn't_ install any packages that weren't installed yet, >> of course. > > On a related note, do you know whether we upgrade the built-in > packages when the user presses 'U' in the list-packages buffer? > > Using the command package-menu-mark-upgrades, that is. Nope, doesn't work, doesn't do anything to those packages. I wish it did, of course. I also don't understand why this is using separate, but repeated logic from package-update. What is the difference between "upgrade" and "update", if any? Is "upgrade" more powerful? BTW, I also noticed that Eglot's version on Emacs 29 is garbled. I had wanted 1.12-emacs29 to somehow show that it is Emacs 29 specific. But version-to-list doesn't like it and the package shows up as version "nil" in package--builtins. Will just change it to 1.12.29, which is less perceptible but works fine (none of this makes any difference to this bug, of course). Jo=C3=A3o