From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephan Stahl Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: M-x compile should tell its status (a little bit better).. Date: 29 Apr 2004 20:13:58 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <8765bir6s9.fsf@eos.franken.de> References: <24608.217.194.34.123.1082528157.squirrel@wwws.franken.de> <40895A13.4020300@yahoo.com> <87oepiqsb9.fsf@eos.franken.de> <408E8DBB.9050409@yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1083265734 10178 80.91.224.253 (29 Apr 2004 19:08:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 19:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 29 21:08:44 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BJGto-0007mu-00 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:08:44 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BJGto-00035R-00 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:08:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BJGqW-0007Sl-44 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 15:05:20 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BJGBE-0004xQ-AE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:22:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BJFyf-0001S1-G0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:10:13 -0400 Original-Received: from [193.175.24.27] (helo=ilsa.franken.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.30) id 1BJFye-0001R6-W6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:09:41 -0400 Original-Received: from router (eos.franken.de [194.95.226.87]) by ilsa.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079D32460D; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:09:15 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Kevin Rodgers In-Reply-To: <408E8DBB.9050409@yahoo.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Original-Lines: 16 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:22374 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:22374 Hi. Kevin Rodgers writes: > I think a better change would be to include mode-line-process in the > *Buffer List* buffer: I could not test it until now.. I think that would be a great change. Really like it. If people think it would be good to have i could adapt the change to the current buff-menu.el which has changed quite a bit since 21.3 over the weekend ? Stephan -- Stephan Stahl