From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Paul Wallington Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: case sensitivity in 'find file'? Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:46:56 +0100 Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87659h2c27.fsf@indigo.shootybangbang.com> References: <1z8yee5lz6.fsf@suldrun.rim.net> <877jty8at7.fsf@indigo.shootybangbang.com> <1zzn6u3y4z.fsf@suldrun.rim.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1088538383 26279 80.91.224.253 (29 Jun 2004 19:46:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 19:46:23 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 29 21:46:16 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BfOYa-0000B9-00 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:46:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BfOaG-0004a3-LP for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jun 2004 15:48:00 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de qIwCf4UREQTFQrf0Y175eAHQevQWIwdwh1utGMuJ8sD7iKZynr X-Orig-Path: indigo.shootybangbang.com!news X-Mailer: Norman X-Attribution: jpw X-Face: R(_z-rF:grdKO.*u`n); p.i$Eiz=h^CO5eDYv"4:K@#\HN09*Ykx}}B{kF/KH}%f_o^Wp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:19296 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:19296 Viktor Haag writes: >> Maybe there should be a `read-file-name-completion-ignore-case' >> user variable ? > > That sounds like a fine idea, because I can easily see that users > might prefer this behaviour be configurable. Wanna send a patch to emacs-devel ?