From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `i' missing in etc/refcard.tex Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 23:43:13 -0400 Message-ID: <8764k6skmk.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <87r72zvefn.fsf@tallis.ilo.ucl.ac.uk> <87ves7jgj8.fsf@lrde.org> <87r72vjfyt.fsf@lrde.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147751030 26817 80.91.229.2 (16 May 2006 03:43:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 03:43:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Kevin Rodgers , Richard Stallman , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 16 05:43:46 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfqTF-00039t-PF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 May 2006 05:43:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfqTF-0000nO-Ai for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 23:43:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FfqT1-0000nH-Ry for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 23:43:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FfqT0-0000n2-Dm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 23:43:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfqT0-0000my-7T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 23:43:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.34] (helo=tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FfqVW-0001LK-Qv; Mon, 15 May 2006 23:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor ([70.53.193.91]) by tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060516034323.ZRYI29052.tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Mon, 15 May 2006 23:43:23 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 91F71D91B9; Mon, 15 May 2006 23:43:13 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: michael.cadilhac@lrde.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac) In-Reply-To: <87r72vjfyt.fsf@lrde.org> (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac's message of "Mon, 15 May 2006 20:33:14 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54545 Archived-At: >>> =AB recherche*r* un sujet dans les index*es* =BB. But I don't see why > (My bad, it's =AB index =BB) >>> the plural is used here, I'd rather write: >>> =AB rechercher un sujet dans l'index =BB. >> I'd just say "chercher dans l'index" > The shorter, the simpler, the better :-) Well, not sure. > However, if it's a =AB recherche =BB, you'd say =AB *re*chercher dans > l'index =BB No. Stefan