From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: rfn-eshadow Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:59:08 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <8763y324rn.fsf@jurta.org> References: <87k5mq60y8.fsf@jurta.org> <87tzltrjqc.fsf@jurta.org> <87wsqp2r7v.fsf@jurta.org> <87d4shgrgo.fsf@gmx.de> <87fxxclfss.fsf@jurta.org> <87ir27t5ae.fsf@gmx.de> <87sl1apql7.fsf@jurta.org> <87zlviunpk.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199841967 3195 80.91.229.12 (9 Jan 2008 01:26:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2008 01:26:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , rms@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 09 02:26:28 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JCPi7-0005eR-02 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 02:26:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JCPhj-0000lf-NM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:26:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JCPgt-00086u-OG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:25:11 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JCPgs-00084O-0Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:25:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JCPgr-00083x-8i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:25:09 -0500 Original-Received: from relay03.kiev.sovam.com ([62.64.120.201]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JCPgn-0002mV-BM; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:25:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [83.170.232.243] (helo=smtp.svitonline.com) by relay03.kiev.sovam.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JCPgk-000JBa-Ib; Wed, 09 Jan 2008 03:25:02 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87zlviunpk.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Mon, 07 Jan 2008 07:57:59 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanner-Signature: 8abf2c83e696415c40c55866f9369f42 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: juri@jurta.org X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Header: Not Detected X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 1976 [Dec 29 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {HEADERS: header Content-Type found without required header Content-Transfer-Encoding} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Rate: 19 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: FreeBSD 4.7-5.2 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.4) (2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86602 Archived-At: >> Thanks, but it now produces weird results, e.g. removing a letter from >> the beginning of an URL and retyping it again doesn't remove the file name >> shadow. This is because url-handlers.el is not loaded, and url-file-handler >> is undefined. I see two variants of fixing this: either by explicitly >> loading url-handlers.el, or adding an ###autoload cookie to url-file-handler >> (I think this is better). > > I've done the latter. After your changes arrived to the trunk I observe a strange behavior: 1. emacs -Q 2. M-x ffap-bindings RET 3. C-x C-f C-a C-k / s u : : / C-g 4. C-h v file-name-handler-alist RET And `file-name-handler-alist' doesn't contain `tramp-file-name-handler' anymore. But in the Emacs 22 branch everything is correct. Do you see the same? -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/