From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jason Earl Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Bazaar repository Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:37:04 -0600 Message-ID: <8763vqd1hr.fsf@xmission.com> References: <87skyvse7k.fsf@xmission.com> <87fxuvl0gi.fsf@offby1.atm01.sea.blarg.net> <87bq5j19ok.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> <1205407220.6161.359.camel@flash> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205426260 30790 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2008 16:37:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eric Hanchrow , bazaar@lists.canonical.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: James Westby Original-X-From: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Thu Mar 13 17:38:03 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from chlorine.canonical.com ([91.189.94.204]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZqRG-0007iy-L1 for gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:37:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZqQg-0002JP-8K; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:37:18 +0000 Original-Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZqQb-0002Iw-9i for bazaar@lists.canonical.com; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:37:13 +0000 Original-Received: from [166.70.13.201] (helo=mgr1.xmission.com) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1JZqQd-0006QA-BP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:37:15 -0600 Original-Received: from jearl.fttp.xmission.com ([166.70.233.10] helo=workhorse.earlhome) by mgr1.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1JZqQZ-0001eu-4O; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:37:11 -0600 Original-Received: from nat.visiongrp.com ([65.162.166.20] helo=jearl-laptop) by workhorse.earlhome with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JZqQZ-00016i-Gd; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:37:11 -0600 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwCAAAAAByaaZbAAAACXBIWXMAABKbAAASmwHgklkM AAABz0lEQVRIx5VW2bHDIAz0jPtRS+pxG1E/fEUHhzjeC2EcJ8JZ0LFa80AkrrgB6L/0K0ypc3Y9 UqYh0I9eOtzG8hwPdkARJiJmOQBk20Ft0OuDcANA/78jdpd2AL99sFy4NDbQLVrsCbAEXYA3DVzE 8D/gkNbJpZsdhHMMN2kdAOKrSo8ttNZrTrYdnEgVweWu0p5b5vjrwSXxoSv73dIibaoSu/4u/vyB sxyD/9YCiE7IRrOP9M4uSK1OrcgOkANA2+PVBsHfQU8AbafRH8e0LoBUSDn2w+JiJiOXi6AngBx7 erYTF42M3wDYAFvH/erSGlNZg/7q0s9pLR1xLNyJGqo8xo2Qzm918AW0etoeQcMHldaDz43STnru k9Lo3XslGgeLidQ/Is0l3bJKkDQ71L7GZGY8DqlEF4l4oSQRMIBQT5JnadSSom8nmZEk/xxinLSR XcgoUyHhbQ8DZHZh1la298tKDaF5ZhXjjd6YALvczwB1SX4CWOGWGGRySQ79kGesmtNLUdOUFkDU gceCp9cuEj6ogYbgqHSzyYW59MKY9EUDqbrTyyGF6eiA2g+6gtoUZKr90A8jlXzL4STZTz3aoN3Q zkNx7unnn3YC+gA3WfRuzLleFgAAAEV6VFh0Q29tbWVudAAAeNpT8MxNTE9VSE/NSy1KLElNUUiq VHD3C1Vwz8gvLilOLsosKFHQSEkty0xOtS3Iyy1KLNfkAgDinBJPV21RsgAAABp6VFh0SlBFRy1D b2xvcnNwYWNlAAB42jMEAAAyADKxisffAAAAInpUWHRKUEVHLVNhbXBsaW5nLWZhY3RvcnMAAHja M6wwBAABtwDbWB23uwAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== In-Reply-To: <1205407220.6161.359.camel@flash> (James Westby's message of "Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:20:20 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Received-SPF: neutral (mgr1.xmission.com: 166.70.233.10 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of xmission.com) client-ip=166.70.233.10; envelope-from=jearl@xmission.com; helo=workhorse.earlhome; X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.233.10 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jearl@xmission.com X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on sa02.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE, T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG, XM_SPF_Neutral autolearn=disabled version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Report: * -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 XM_SPF_Neutral SPF-Neutral X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 (built Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:44:12 +0100) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mgr1.xmission.com) X-BeenThere: bazaar@lists.canonical.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: bazaar discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Errors-To: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general:38457 gmane.emacs.devel:92419 Archived-At: James Westby writes: > On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 23:20 -0600, Jason Earl wrote: >> Eric Hanchrow writes: >> >> > I tried >> > >> > $ bzr clone http://bzr.notengoamigos.org/emacs/branches/EMACS_22_BASE >> > >> > bzr ground for about an hour, using 100% of the CPU, then finally failed with >> > >> > bzr: ERROR: No such file: 'http://bzr.notengoamigos.org/emacs/.bzr/repository/indices/5b5aedf70f9a908bd9b77d5e921f468f.tix' >> >> The process I use to update the Bazaar repository from CVS apparently >> moves some of the needed pack and index files around. It's possible >> that you could go into the directory that was created and do a "bzr >> pull" and finish the download, but I am not sure if that always works or >> if I just got lucky one time :). > > Hi, > > Can you tell us what that process is? > > (Apologies if I missed that in previous mails). > >> I would suggest that you download the premade repository, cd to the >> branches directory and then do try your command again. >> >> $ bzr clone http://bzr.notengoamigos.org/emacs/branches/EMACS_22_BASE >> >> This will be *much* faster as it will re use the changesets that trunk >> and EMACS_22_BASE have in common. I am going to get in touch with the >> bazaar mailing lists and see if there is a better way to do what I am >> doing. It's possible that using the "smart" server would protect you >> from this occurrence (I don't know), but the smart server is even slower >> when checking out these large branches. Part of that may be the fact >> that my server is not very powerful and using the smart server puts most >> of the processing burden on the server end. > > If this is caused by what I think it is then the smart server won't > help unfortunately. > > I can recommend that everyone sets up a shared repository for > themselves (bzr init-repo dir), it will massively reduce disk usage > and time for some operations. My original instructions didn't stress using a shared repository, but my current ones do. In fact, my current instructions suggest downloading a premade shared repository. > You need to do this before creating a branch, and then create the > branch inside the directory you create (the dir argument to > init-repo). Then all branches that you create under there will share > storage where possible. > > Jason, did you create these branches in a rich-root-pack format > repository, or just pack-0.92 (the default with 1.0 or later)? I used the default pack-0.92 format. I honestly wasn't sure which format was the most appropriate. Jason