From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sven Joachim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; etc/DOC-${version}.buildnumber Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:32:32 +0200 Message-ID: <8763unt4nz.fsf@gmx.de> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208018103 20489 80.91.229.12 (12 Apr 2008 16:35:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Peter Dyballa To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 12 18:35:35 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JkihP-0006dI-Lp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:35:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jkigl-0001L1-PR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:34:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jkigh-0001IY-6l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:34:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jkigf-0001Fp-QJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:34:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jkigf-0001Ff-HG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:34:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jkigf-0002ZD-Cp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:34:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Jkige-0006dR-UH for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:34:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jkigb-0002YN-9n for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:34:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jkiga-0002Y4-Qq for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:34:41 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2008 16:34:39 -0000 Original-Received: from p54866441.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO debian) [84.134.100.65] by mail.gmx.net (mp008) with SMTP; 12 Apr 2008 18:34:39 +0200 X-Authenticated: #28250155 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18tfTEASpAtWZajufsD10MY5NSxa6e/+aoMY4+rQ1 XGWCeYRvsxWHqD In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:10:20 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110008 (No Gnus v0.8) Emacs/22.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95060 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21993 Archived-At: On 2008-04-12 15:10 +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Peter Dyballa >> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:00:23 +0200 >> Cc: >> >> This file is not deleted by 'make clean', so upon a new build its >> number is incremented and more and more DOC files get installed. > > I think this is intended, as you still have the Emacs binary from the > previous build (emacs-${version}.buildnumber) around, and could use > it, e.g., for comparison or some other purpose. That's not true, the Emacs binaries are all deleted by `make clean'. I had already reported that inconsistency some months before, see my message in [1] and Glenn's reply in [2]. Sven [1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-07/msg01778.html [2] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-08/msg00004.html