From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eshell compatibility Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:43:03 +0100 Message-ID: <87639019vs.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87r5rpb66l.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259059506 7456 80.91.229.12 (24 Nov 2009 10:45:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 24 11:44:59 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NCstG-0004C5-2D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:44:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38332 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NCstF-0006X8-J5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:44:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NCsrl-0005vg-2D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:43:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NCsrf-0005tr-Iw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:43:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45475 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NCsrf-0005tj-AS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:43:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:41438) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NCsre-0003dO-VS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:43:19 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2009 10:43:15 -0000 Original-Received: from h-62.96.202.36.host.de.colt.net (EHLO ubuntu.local) [62.96.202.36] by mail.gmx.net (mp066) with SMTP; 24 Nov 2009 11:43:15 +0100 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18z2bgBvv0zCe9Es7Ko0x4hSN5wxHSw90t1YEhPdX Du+qppl0v2Amnb In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:47:32 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.68 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117666 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> Eshell contains a lot of compatibility code. Does it mean, eshell is >> still synchronized upstream, and I must add compatibility code as well? >> Or could I trust, that the version in trunk is used in GNU Emacs 23, and >> anybody moving it out must add compatibility code herself? > > I don't think there's any kind of "upstream" version of Eshell > any more. In any case I wouldn't worry about it. Done. There are some things left to do, for example support of `getenv', `setenv' and `executable-find' on remote hosts. But this might be postponed until after the release. > Stefan Best regards, Michael.