From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: re: Emacs core TLS support Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:59:59 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <8762ycfhqo.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <878wc1vfh3.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87r5ptpnz2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <871vhsvkut.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87d41csktn.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k4v0n0m8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrrvfnc4.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87r5i2d00q.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87zkwqijye.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <878w4actmg.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877hju123h.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <8762yklrdk.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrqzhrjv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwxmihyz.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284217226 31669 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2010 15:00:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:00:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: gnutls-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: gnutls-devel-bounces+pgp-gnutls-dev=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 11 17:00:25 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: pgp-gnutls-dev@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuRZ0-0001t4-UD for pgp-gnutls-dev@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 17:00:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45065 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OuRZ0-0000We-Fw for pgp-gnutls-dev@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:00:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53808 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OuRYx-0000WZ-2P for gnutls-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:00:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuRYv-0002A8-QT for gnutls-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:00:18 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:47931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuRYv-00029z-F2 for gnutls-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 11:00:17 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuRYr-0001ml-NR for gnutls-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 17:00:13 +0200 Original-Received: from c-24-14-16-248.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([24.14.16.248]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 17:00:13 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by c-24-14-16-248.hsd1.il.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 17:00:13 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 27 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-14-16-248.hsd1.il.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LfXQxOPVCmRNNWKGrKZrW9oT10I= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: gnutls-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GnuTLS development discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: gnutls-devel-bounces+pgp-gnutls-dev=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: gnutls-devel-bounces+pgp-gnutls-dev=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.encryption.gpg.gnutls.devel:4500 gmane.emacs.devel:129982 Archived-At: Nearly ready. Since the last patch we have: - full initialization and handshake (no memory issues, etc.) - everything happens in gnutls-boot, including global initialization; all the parameters are either x509 or anon - use of gnutls_initstage in the process to mark progress of initialization and whether the process is done initializing and handshaking - no SRP anywhere, just anon and x509 (I'll add SRP if we need it and when the other two are working) Now I get GNUTLS_E_INSUFFICIENT_CREDENTIALS when I open a x509 connection to an IMAP TLS server so I think there's still work to do. The trust file seems to be wrong (see lisp/net/gnutls.el, I tried both "/etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt" and "/etc/ssl/certs/ca.pem"). The GnuTLS examples don't seem to cover the standard situation of talking to a web server over SSL and possibly accepting an insecure connection if the server credentials are bad. I must have missed something. Could the GnuTLS developers look at my patch and help me out? Thanks Ted