From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why there is no char type? Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:20:53 +0900 Message-ID: <8762utqxju.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87ipywqwx7.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87ei9k2zot.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87ei9jr5kf.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87bp4nbgzj.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292532971 27466 80.91.229.12 (16 Dec 2010 20:56:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 16 21:56:07 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTKrt-0000ED-BE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:56:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47132 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PTKrq-0006hs-5x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:56:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34499 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PTKrl-0006hd-IW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:55:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTKrk-0000HI-IT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:55:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mgmt1.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]:33199) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTKri-0000Fu-Np; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:55:54 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt1.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9450C3FA04DF; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:23:21 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0C54E1A3BD1; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:20:54 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <87bp4nbgzj.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" ed3b274cc037 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133750 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > I have a hard time imagining that since automatic conversions in both > directions are in place for compatibility IIRC. Could you point to a > few instances of these frequently detected bugs from your bug tracker? They were eliminated from XEmacs itself over a decade ago, long before there was a tracker.