From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Dunsmore Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:52:16 -0600 Message-ID: <8762tnjlrz.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87iq197ool.fsf@mail.bantercat.co.uk> <87pqveyct2.fsf@gmail.com> <87ocayl81d.fsf@manor-farm.org> <0E084C6C-6FD1-4C74-BD9F-34F2830B93C5@gmail.com> <87bp6ytacd.fsf_-_@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87fwsubckf.fsf@gnu.org> <87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsr9wrd.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57921 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pew3n-0001Iv-BJ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:52:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pew3m-0005k1-32 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:52:19 -0500 Received: from deathroller.dunsmor.com ([98.129.169.48]:52559) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pew3l-0005jx-Vw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jan 2011 15:52:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87fwsr9wrd.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:05:10 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Achim Gratz writes: > Bastien writes: >> Wow! I love this. My preference goes to Jason's version: both plain >> simple and colorful. > > Please do not use fixed measures in pixels, points, inches or > centimeters and prescribed font families. Let this choice reside with > the user, they know what fonts in which sizes are readable on their > computer. Relative font sizes with a 1.2 scaling factor or the symbolic > fontsizes specified by CSS are more friendly. > >> I also love Eric's expandable table of contents: >> the one we have for now often clutters the page too much... > > +1 > > I think the unicorn icon should be a bit smaller so that the reserved > space on top is not so large and it might be a quicklink back to the top > worg page. In Jasons version to me the space between list items, table > rows, etc. looks a bit too large - but that should be easily tuned. Good suggestions. I made several unit changes from px to em, removed the line-height property, and removed Georgia as the default font: diff --git a/worg.css b/worg.css index 9742965..ccb732a 100644 --- a/worg.css +++ b/worg.css @@ -4,2 +4 @@ - font:14px Georgia,serif; - line-height:18px; + font:0.9em serif; @@ -44 +46 @@ - font-size:30px; + font-size:2.1em; @@ -67 +69 @@ - font-size:21px; + font-size:1.45em; @@ -80 +82 @@ - font-size:19px; + font-size:1.3em; @@ -88 +90 @@ - font-size:17px; + font-size:1.2em; In h2, h3, and h4, removing Arial as the font-family and letting the browser use the default sans font looked ugly. Is there a more general way to specify an Arial-like font? Properties that define how close the content comes to the unicorn image still have px units because it needs to be an absolute value. Let me know if this still looks good. Regards, Jason